Mock 7 rd draft

[DKphin]

This is from Bleacher Report(I know everybody hates BR):

Round 1: Vic Beasley, OLB, Clemson
Round 2: Breshad Perriman, WR, UCF
Round 3: Carl Davis, DT, Iowa
Round 4: Ramik Wilson, ILB, Georgia
Round 5: Damian Swann, CB, Georgia
Round 6: Jon Feliciano, OG, Miami
Round 7: Kenny Hilliard, RB, LSU

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...draft-7-round-predictions-post-combine/page/8

I do not know what to think of the selection of Beasley in the 1st. He is a dynamic Pass Rusher, but can not handle the power he'll face in the run game. Purely as a pass rusher, we better have a design to keep him clean in the run game. Also if the play flows away from him, it seems as though he becomes disinterested.
Breshad Perriman is definitely too high for a guy that has many areas of his game that are lacking. His route running and polish leave alot to be desired. He also lacks a quick burst, but in his defense, he is athletic. I just do not know if he is going to get alot of separartion against NFL DBs. The only way I would take him is if we could drop to the bottom of the 3rd or pick him up in the 4th.
I do not know if Carl Davis will last until our the 3rd pick. I like the pick as he is suited to one technique DT we have been needing.
Ramik Wilson in the 4th is good.
5th - 7th I am indifferent. Although I will say that Feliciano would be a good utility backup.

 

[AL R]

This is from Bleacher Report(I know everybody hates BR):

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...draft-7-round-predictions-post-combine/page/8

I do not know what to think of the selection of Beasley in the 1st. He is a dynamic Pass Rusher, but can not handle the power he'll face in the run game. Purely as a pass rusher, we better have a design to keep him clean in the run game. Also if the play flows away from him, it seems as though he becomes disinterested.
Breshad Perriman is definitely to high for a guy that has many areas of his game that are lacking. His route running and polish leave alot to be desired. He also lacks a quick burst, but in his defense, he is athletic. I just do not know if he is going to get alot of separartion against NFL DBs. The only way I would take him is if we could drop to the bottom of the 3rd or pick him up in the 4th.
I do not know if Carl Davis will last until our the 3rd pick. I like the pick as he is suited to one technique DT we have been needing.
Ramik Wilson in the 4th is good.
5th - 7th I am indifferent. Although I will say that Feliciano would be a good utility backup.

No to Beasley becasue of what you say and how do they think Davis gets to the third round?

 

[ONole1]

Under a different staff I think Beasley could be very good. The problem is Coyle wouldn't play his as a rookie for one, and if he did he wouldn't figure out how to use him. I like Perriman and have seen some people even have him in round one. He is raw, but he's a hands catcher and I think you can work with that. Besides, like him or not he's got Michael Irvin in his corner and I believe will work hard with him to make him the best he can be. I would actually draft Perriman in round two before I would draft Beasley at #14.

 

[Fintastic2124]

Man, I see Beasley mocked to the fins quite a bit. We suck at a topping the run. Would rather take a backer or DT if we go defense.really want one of the receivers though.

 

[WaxOn WaxOff]

I see Beasley as a person that can learn from and take over came Wake's position. Wake is 33, Beasley has similar traits.

 

[I am Bane]

I see Beasley as a person that can learn from and take over came Wake's position. Wake is 33, Beasley has similar traits.

interesting comment here with Wake age and all.... I do like Beasley a lot obviously, but he really really needs to improve on the run, where he is extremely off

but wow he can hit that edge and dip, rip around the edge right to the QB... once he even learns some more moves and uses those hands more, he can become great in the NFL!!!

 

[finns13]

beastly has a motor that doesnt quit. Not sure where you saw that on tape but he runs sideline to Sideline

 

[j-off-her-doll]

I don't like most of the picks, but I'd be THRILLED to land Beasley in the 1st and Davis in the 3rd, so I'd forgive all else. Beasley's athletic comps are guys like Von Miller, Demarcus Ware, and Clay Matthews. He's a much more fluid athlete than Wake. Dupree has a more similar athletic skill set to Wake. I think Beasley goes #3 overall to Jacksonville, so it's a non-issue. Fowler being rated ahead of Beasley or Dupree makes zero sense to me.

 

[I am Bane]

Fowler at this time seems more technique than the other guys you mentioned. He uses his hands extremely well, and disengages excellent, he uses strength as well with a variety of pass rushes, and also is solid again the run. Beasley lacks at this time with a lot of that... Bud dupree as well in most of it, and Bud really doesnt dip, rip around the edge right at the QB either like Fowler and Beasley do.

thats why I believe many have Fowler ahead of these guys.

 

[j-off-her-doll]

Fowler at this time seems more technique than the other guys you mentioned. He uses his hands extremely well, and disengages excellent, he uses strength as well with a variety of pass rushes, and also is solid again the run. Beasley lacks at this time with a lot of that... Bud dupree as well in most of it, and Bud really doesnt dip, rip around the edge right at the QB either like Fowler and Beasley do.

thats why I believe many have Fowler ahead of these guys.

My concern with Fowler is that he's not explosive, and he's not quick. His 7.4 3-cone was worse than Jake Fisher's 7.25 and only 0.08's better than Cam Erving. His vert and broad were also pedestrian. It doesn't make any sense to me to spend a premium pick on an average athlete at a position where athleticism dictates success to such a high degree. More than that, Fowler was not a dominate college football player. People are treating him like a great athlete that will be much better at the NFL level than he was at the college level, but he's just not that guy. I don't see him every being more than a 6-7 sack a year guy, and, for a 1st RD pick, I think there's a good chance that he's a flat out bust.

 

[I am Bane]

My concern with Fowler is that he's not explosive, and he's not quick. His 7.4 3-cone was worse than Jake Fisher's 7.25 and only 0.08's better than Cam Erving. His vert and broad were also pedestrian. It doesn't make any sense to me to spend a premium pick on an average athlete at a position where athleticism dictates success to such a high degree. More than that, Fowler was not a dominate college football player. People are treating him like a great athlete that will be much better at the NFL level than he was at the college level, but he's just not that guy. I don't see him every being more than a 6-7 sack a year guy, and, for a 1st RD pick, I think there's a good chance that he's a flat out bust.

flat out bust i disagree.... but if he is picked so highly, i understand what you are talking about.

Fowler really shot up the list and boards people are mocking and such within the past couple weeks. it actually shocked me how much he flew up, and i agree with your statements above. my comments in the post before is basically why i think this happened... but i do understand your concerns. i myself was shocked to see him becoming ranked so highly... but ithink he will be a solid player, but definitely not a pure edge rusher sack wise.