Mock Draft 6.0 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Mock Draft 6.0

Nick13

Seasoned Veteran
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,384
Reaction score
3
Location
Arizona/New Jersey
here we go, the 6th installment in my mock draft series.

1. Jake Long T Michigan
he may not be the most popular choice, but he is the right choice, we have two GAPING holes on our Oline and he fills one of them right off the bat giving us further flexibility in the 2-4 rounds where the real depth lies in this draft, this is one of the most bottom heavy drafts i've seen in a while and i think that going with Jake here gives us the opprotunity to capitalize on that.

2a. Antoine Cason CB Arizona
our starting corners are Will Allen and Mike Lehan. yeah, Mike Lehan, i dont know about you all, but i'm not comfortable at all with him being our guy. Cason is a playmaker and in my opinion the most complete corner in the draft with experience, hardware, numbers, intensity, and clutch. Gives us a play maker in the secondary which has lacked since Patrick Surtain was auctioned off (grrrrr...).

2b. Carl Nicks T Nebraska
would play guard for us and be an absolute beast. at 6'4'' 341, he runs a 5.12 40, has 35 inch arms and benched 31 reps at the combine. I know a lot of people are iffy on going with two olinemen this early, but i feel that it starts in the trenches and with a line of Carey, Smiley, Satele, Nicks, Long, that it will give John Beck the protection he needs to succeed and also give Ronnie some serious holes, could easily give us one of the best young offensive lines in the league.

3. Philip Wheeler LB Georgia Tech
I like Wheeler here because he can play both outside and inside, would give us some serious depth at linebacker, and would likely compete with Torbor for a starting spot next to Crowder, helps us get younger without a huge drop off.

4. Paul Hubbard WR Wisconsin
thought about going QB here, but i really think John Beck needs a chance to suceed, if he falters McCown can step in and at least hold down the fort, we dont need to be worrying about developing 2 young QBs, lets focus on the one we have. Hubbard is a beast, he stands at 6'2'' 221 and ran a 4.38 40 at his pro day, he also has a 39.5 inch vertical leap, his stock isnt sky high because he is coming off a knee injury, but if he's running and jumping like that, i dont think there are any adverse effects. In the 6 games he played in in 07, he averaged 21.8 ypc which is incredible. Would give us an incredibly talented group of WR's with Ginn Jr and Wilford.

5. This Doesn't Look Like Arrowhead Stadium...Wait, Who Am I Again?

6a. Gary Guyton LB Georgia Tech
he's 6'1'' 245 and runs a 4.47 40 with a 40 inch vertical leap. Think about these possibilities, let's say he doesnt crack the rotation at linebacker, fine. let him play SS, at 6'1'' 245 and speed and hops like that, tight ends and running backs will be crapping themselves, its like having a 5th linebacker on the filed without giving up any speed and even if that doesnt work out, he'd make one hell of a special teamer, he'd be a great assest on punt and kick coverages, a low risk in the 6th round with enormous potential.

6b. Keilen Dykes DT West Virginia
would play as an end in our scheme, has solid size at 6'3'' 306 and moves decently well with a 5.08 40. a 2-time All Big East Selection, he provides depth right off the bat and would likely push for playing time, allows us to rotate linemen which as we have seen was our down fall in run stopping last year.

7a. Kory Sperry TE Colorado St.
had his most productive season in 05 notching 547 yards on 42 catches, also at 6'6'' 260 has a nice frame. Runs well at 4.79, possibly a case of a good player stuck on a bad team. The biggest bright side for any tight end we draft is that he cant be any worse than David Martin.

7b. Lance Ball RB Maryland
stands at 5'9'' 225 and runs in the 4.4's, he certainly has the physical tools to succeed. I see him developing into a Micheal Turner type, could eventually provide a compliment to Ronnie Brown and allow Ronnie to take less punishment.

there ya go, ?'s or comments are much appreciated.
 
Nice Mock. I agree with everything.

However, traumatic brain injuries are not funny. Really. You wouldn't take brain injuries so lightly if a close friend or relative had their life ruined because of a brain injury.
 
Nice Mock. I agree with everything.

However, traumatic brain injuries are not funny. Really. You wouldn't take brain injuries so lightly if a close friend or relative had their life ruined because of a brain injury.

i wasnt poking fun at him having a brain injury, i wish Trent Green the best, i was simply poking fun at the front office trading a pick for a player who had a brain injury which was a horrible move and a waste of a pick.
 
Say what you will to justify a sick joke, but brain injuries aren't funny.

Don't want to hijack your thread, so I'll say this: Your argument that picking Jake Long first gives us flexibility in a deep draft is very convincing. I agree 100%. Especially if Cason is around at #32.
 
Nicks will not be there with the late second...
 
Say what you will to justify a sick joke, but brain injuries aren't funny.

Don't want to hijack your thread, so I'll say this: Your argument that picking Jake Long first gives us flexibility in a deep draft is very convincing. I agree 100%. Especially if Cason is around at #32.

i personally dont think it was a 'sick joke', first of all, we're talking about a concussion that Trent Green knowingly put himself at risk of getting, it's not like he's an innocent victim (not saying it was his fault, but saying he knew it was a possibility), secondly, a concussion can be a serious injury for sure, but in the realm of brain related trauma its relatively low on the scale, it's not like i was poking fun at stroke victims, thirdly as i said before the joke was on the front office, not Green, honestly, as a business decision, would you hang your hopes on a guy who has had one too many hits on the noggin? it was a boneheaded move (no pun intended) for the FO to waste a pick on that, and THAT is what i was making fun of is the waste of a pick not brain injuries if he had a history of knee injuries and then ended his career by blowing it out, i would have said something about it too.
 
I'd say it's 40/60 on Cason being there at 32 and 99% chance he'll be off the board at 57.

With the recent Talib marijuana incident, I think Cason will be going sooner than originally expected. I had the Packers taking Talib in my mock, looks like they might opt for Cason now.
 
Say what you will to justify a sick joke, but brain injuries aren't funny.

Don't want to hijack your thread, so I'll say this: Your argument that picking Jake Long first gives us flexibility in a deep draft is very convincing. I agree 100%. Especially if Cason is around at #32.

i think its funny
 
i wasnt poking fun at him having a brain injury, i wish Trent Green the best, i was simply poking fun at the front office trading a pick for a player who had a brain injury which was a horrible move and a waste of a pick.

The brain injury was in the FO not the player.
 
cant say that I like this mock. Most of the problems for me stem right from the top.

1. Is Jake Long better than Vernon Carey? No he isnt. Carey has started at the LT position and did fairly well for himself. 3 sacks given up, a 5.9 average for running plays to his side and only 7 false starts. On top of that Jake Long doesnt really have the feet to play the LT spot at an elite level so its hard to justify him at 1.

2. Antoine Cason I really doubt will be there at 32. The guy is one of best finishers at the cornerback spot and will surprise people at high he could potentially go. I see him fitting in Arizona very well.

2. With Nicks off the field problems, I doubt he gets picked by us. When your not even allowed to workout at your pro day due to off the field issues, that really says something. On top of that, why would you move him to guard when he can easily play tackle? I dont get that logic. The guy has quick feet, good balance, long arms, and good strength. Sticking him at guard is a waste.

3. I like this pick. Im pretty high on wheeler. I like his ability to blitz from the middle and his physicality in the middle. If he is there and depending on what has been picked before, he would represent good value.

4. I dont mind the position, cant stand the player. Hubbard would represent bad value and would be a reach in the 4th. Under productive, has trouble separating at times due to poor route technique, and hands are alittle questionable.

6. Guyton I think goes higher. Alot of teams like what he brings to the table especially with those triangle numbers of his

6. Keilen Dykes isnt bad. I wouldnt mind seeing how long his arms are because as a 3-4 end, arm length is key to control the tackle in their gaps.

7. Its a seventh round pick so whatever

7. Same as above.
 
Back
Top Bottom