Mularkey, the source of all evil. | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Mularkey, the source of all evil.

Joey 22

Practice Squad
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
0
Its not to say the rest of the team cant be held accountable but his play calling not only has been absolutely predictable, but also he hasnt been calling his plays up to our players strengths.

Culpepper is the kind of QB that if you are leading 7-0 he will turn that into a 21-0 in just 2 series, but if you are behind 7-0, you will find yourself 0-21 in just 2 series...

He is the kind of QB that you have let loose, if you keep him on a leash when you are ahead or tied or just down by a field goal, or force him to make things happen when way behind, he will look very average. And so far thats all we have asked him to do, manage the game, dink and dunk. My god he has never been known to be good at that, NEVER.

He is a big play waiting to happen, we saw flashes of that on the Steelers game, he was our only offensive production all game long, we saw that on the Bills game in the Chambers TD. If we wanted a short game QB, a game manager we should of gone with Brees, neither one is all that much better than the other, they are different. Tommie Harris is one of the better DTs in the game but if you ask him top play a 2 gap scheme he will suck!!!! Its the same with QBs, if you ask Brees to go 50 yds downfield 10 times a game he will not do well, and if you ask Pep to dink dunk he wont do well either...

Average I say, cause he isnt half as bad as everyone makes him out to be, he has thrown for over 500 yds in two games, he is in pace for a 3,600 yds season, thats not bad at all, he has a 60% comp pct. that isnt bad at all, he has 3 picks against 1 TD, big deal...!!! at least he is in fact cutting them down, from 2, on the Steelers game to one on the Bills game, he threw his TD on the Bills game, despite the loss he had a 91.9 QB rating!!!! While sucking up 7 sacks!!!!!! Man if we havent done any worse its BECAUSE OF HIM!!!!

The Oline...well its really bad, but we arent playing to its strengths either, this Line is even better than what Linehan had to work with, but Linehan had some smart play calling, How often did we go from the shotgun last year? And what about this? we have called 3 shotgun plays this year, last year we would call 10 a game...

On the O line subject, what benefit you get from having an average 330 pounds per line man if you dont run the ball? Also do you think that a defense that has continously have to fight those hogs on the trenches and LBs that consistently have to tackle a 220-240 pound RBs rush the passer with the same intensity?

Ronnie, what benefit you get from spending a second overall on a RB if you dont run the ball? If you play a Cover 2 Defense built to play the pass, such as the Bills and your RB is averaging 4.7 yds a carry, why do you abandon the run? 15 freaking attempts all game long... thats a shame...

The difference between Mularkey and Linehan is that Linehan will take what the defense gives him, while Mularkey will stick to his moronic gameplan whatever happens, thats why Linehan is running the ball at St Louis, he has Bulger, Holt Bruce, and a rather unproven back on Steven Jackson, most the Ds will play them off, so he runs with the Safetys playing 20 yds from the LOS, so far Jackson averages 112 yds a game and 5.1 a carry, and its not that he is all that great or that their O line is all that powerfull, its just that teams play the pass against them.

Teams used to put 8 on the box against us in 2005, Chambers and Frerrotte didnt scare anyone, and BAM they produced now Chambers is a household name, and we brought Pepper and we are known as an air it out team, so the Bills and Steelers played the pass more often than not...

Also with Mularkey, we throw a lot but only short and mid range, that isnt usefull to keep the Safeties off, going deep is, with Linehan we went deep wether we would complete it or not just cause that would keep defenses honest, right now that dink and dunk isnt accomplishing anything...

So overall I think that we would be much better of if we ran the ball, cause teams like the Bills are playing the pass, and the ocassional deep throw just to keep defenses guessing and try and hit jackpot...

Bagget surely understands this and is a Saban old timer from Mich State and also knows Linehans offense at perfection, IMO we wont fire Mularkey just so he wont give our playbook up and at season end he will be shown the door and Bagget and Garrett will fight OC spot.
 
Great post....

Ronnie Brown also seems to be the runner that does better in the 2nd half (much like RW) because he wears down defenses. Unfortunately, I don't think things will change anytime soon. How many games did it take for Saban to drag Linehan to the sidelines?
 
I miss Linehan too...if he wasn't such a good OC he wouldnt be a HC now. I hope Saban puts some sense into Mularkey much like he did with Linehan and turns things around. A little blocking from the OL would help develop those long pass patterns you're talking about.
 
Sorry...watched Culpepper from the beginning in Minnesota (about only games we get on cable TV around here in South Dakota...thank goodness for NFL Sunday Ticket)...he will NOT be the answer in Miami.

He'll win a game now and then, but he'll find a way give games away...fumble, interception, bad decisions

Moss made him look pretty good from time to time in MN...not going to happen with any regularity in Miami.

I've been a finfan since '72-'73 so I'm hopin' for a miracle...but folks, Daunte isn't it. Harrington...maybe (outside chance) but not Daunte.

I really, really hope I'm wrong.
 
When was Mularkey the OC for the Steelers? I remember Kordell Stewart's "Pro Bowl" season under him, but that's about it.
 
I'm sorry but in his record breaking year he was a majority dink and dunk with run after the catch. I know he has this great reputation as being a downfield thrower but he gets the majority of his stats on the dink and dunk.

In a record breaking year they went 8-8, finishing off the season 3-7. They shouldn't have made the playoffs if not for the sadness of the NFC.
He put up monster stats that didn't account for anything. I am sick of people talking about his stats. He clearly didn't play well and yet produced fine numbers. I am going to bump the thread I posted on this. He gets alot of "Fantasy Points" in games he loses. What does that tell you.

That said, I do agree that some of Mularkey's calls have not been good. But that is mostly between his balance of run and pass. Not necessarily his pass play selection.


As for Linehan, everyone was complaining about him when he was here. In St. Louis he is doing okay, but his offense has been terrible.
 
this is a malarky thread not a daunte thread

so getting back on topic, it seems he does not want to run the ball, against pitt with a lead we still threw every damn down

last year if they blitzed us like they are this year, we used to do a lot of 5 yard slants that turned into bigger gains due to the athleticism of the recievers

i hope malarky changes things this week and watches a lot of film
 
brandon1986 said:
this is a malarky thread not a daunte thread

so getting back on topic, it seems he does not want to run the ball, against pitt with a lead we still threw every damn down

last year if they blitzed us like they are this year, we used to do a lot of 5 yard slants that turned into bigger gains due to the athleticism of the recievers

i hope malarky changes things this week and watches a lot of film

Thanks, I should of wrote in the title NO DAUNTE BASHING ALLOWED...and for you the guy who says he is a stat QB, you are right thats why I said he is the kind of QB who will not change the outcome of a game, if you are winning, you will win BIG, if you are losing, you will lose BIG...and in 2004 he threw 20 yards or deeper 10 times per game and completed 68% his deep thows with out Moss (he was sidelined).
 
Joey 22 said:
Culpepper is the kind of QB that if you are leading 7-0 he will turn that into a 21-0 in just 2 series, but if you are behind 7-0, you will find yourself 0-21 in just 2 series...

He is the kind of QB that you have let loose, if you keep him on a leash when you are ahead or tied or just down by a field goal, or force him to make things happen when way behind, he will look very average. And so far thats all we have asked him to do, manage the game, dink and dunk. My god he has never been known to be good at that, NEVER.

He is a big play waiting to happen, we saw flashes of that on the Steelers game, he was our only offensive production all game long, we saw that on the Bills game in the Chambers TD. If we wanted a short game QB, a game manager we should of gone with Brees, neither one is all that much better than the other, they are different. Tommie Harris is one of the better DTs in the game but if you ask him top play a 2 gap scheme he will suck!!!! Its the same with QBs, if you ask Brees to go 50 yds downfield 10 times a game he will not do well, and if you ask Pep to dink dunk he wont do well either...

Average I say, cause he isnt half as bad as everyone makes him out to be, he has thrown for over 500 yds in two games, he is in pace for a 3,600 yds season, thats not bad at all, he has a 60% comp pct. that isnt bad at all, he has 3 picks against 1 TD, big deal...!!! at least he is in fact cutting them down, from 2, on the Steelers game to one on the Bills game, he threw his TD on the Bills game, despite the loss he had a 91.9 QB rating!!!! While sucking up 7 sacks!!!!!! Man if we havent done any worse its BECAUSE OF HIM!!!!

comments on Culpepper seemed appropriate due to the focus of the initial post.

I'm not a fan of Mularky or some of his "I can't believe he called THAT" play calling but a fair share of the plays that have gone poorly may not have looked like as bad had they be run more effectively...thus, again, the Culpepper comments...
 
Do you guys think Saban has agreed with Mularkeys calls? Do you guys think NS has noticed how bad his playcalling has been? Or do you guys think he is blaming CPep?
 
i think the original post by joey 22 hit this on point..the reason saban got linehan originally was cause he liked his unpredictability when he attacked defenses...linehan has always been a daunte supporter, he even told saban that daunte would be the guy for us...daunte is perfect for that offense...my question is this, i thought we were supposed to be keeping that same system from last year? and mularky was jus supposed to add some plays or tweak it up or whatever...was all that just a bunch of bull? and it seems like we constructed an OL that is made to rush the ball all day and jus physically wear down defenses...they r not quick on their feet in pass protection....all this being said....i remember last year after the pats game when people were calling for linehans head after those throws at the goal line....so maybe we should give mularky a few more games? do u guys think we should bring mularky from the booth to the sidelines during the games? i mean we went undefeated after we brought linehan to the sidelines last year...GO PHINS
 
Mularkey was good in Pittsburgh and I think he also made touchdown Tommy into a good Qb. As a head coach he was awful. He's absolutely terrible with the media almost as bad as Gregg Williams but not quite. Everybody hated Linehan after a few games last year so hopefully Mularkey can have do the same thing he did last year.
 
Joey 22 said:
Its not to say the rest of the team cant be held accountable but his play calling not only has been absolutely predictable, but also he hasnt been calling his plays up to our players strengths.

Culpepper is the kind of QB that if you are leading 7-0 he will turn that into a 21-0 in just 2 series, but if you are behind 7-0, you will find yourself 0-21 in just 2 series...

He is the kind of QB that you have let loose, if you keep him on a leash when you are ahead or tied or just down by a field goal, or force him to make things happen when way behind, he will look very average. And so far thats all we have asked him to do, manage the game, dink and dunk. My god he has never been known to be good at that, NEVER.

He is a big play waiting to happen, we saw flashes of that on the Steelers game, he was our only offensive production all game long, we saw that on the Bills game in the Chambers TD. If we wanted a short game QB, a game manager we should of gone with Brees, neither one is all that much better than the other, they are different. Tommie Harris is one of the better DTs in the game but if you ask him top play a 2 gap scheme he will suck!!!! Its the same with QBs, if you ask Brees to go 50 yds downfield 10 times a game he will not do well, and if you ask Pep to dink dunk he wont do well either...

Average I say, cause he isnt half as bad as everyone makes him out to be, he has thrown for over 500 yds in two games, he is in pace for a 3,600 yds season, thats not bad at all, he has a 60% comp pct. that isnt bad at all, he has 3 picks against 1 TD, big deal...!!! at least he is in fact cutting them down, from 2, on the Steelers game to one on the Bills game, he threw his TD on the Bills game, despite the loss he had a 91.9 QB rating!!!! While sucking up 7 sacks!!!!!! Man if we havent done any worse its BECAUSE OF HIM!!!!

The Oline...well its really bad, but we arent playing to its strengths either, this Line is even better than what Linehan had to work with, but Linehan had some smart play calling, How often did we go from the shotgun last year? And what about this? we have called 3 shotgun plays this year, last year we would call 10 a game...

On the O line subject, what benefit you get from having an average 330 pounds per line man if you dont run the ball? Also do you think that a defense that has continously have to fight those hogs on the trenches and LBs that consistently have to tackle a 220-240 pound RBs rush the passer with the same intensity?

Ronnie, what benefit you get from spending a second overall on a RB if you dont run the ball? If you play a Cover 2 Defense built to play the pass, such as the Bills and your RB is averaging 4.7 yds a carry, why do you abandon the run? 15 freaking attempts all game long... thats a shame...

The difference between Mularkey and Linehan is that Linehan will take what the defense gives him, while Mularkey will stick to his moronic gameplan whatever happens, thats why Linehan is running the ball at St Louis, he has Bulger, Holt Bruce, and a rather unproven back on Steven Jackson, most the Ds will play them off, so he runs with the Safetys playing 20 yds from the LOS, so far Jackson averages 112 yds a game and 5.1 a carry, and its not that he is all that great or that their O line is all that powerfull, its just that teams play the pass against them.

Teams used to put 8 on the box against us in 2005, Chambers and Frerrotte didnt scare anyone, and BAM they produced now Chambers is a household name, and we brought Pepper and we are known as an air it out team, so the Bills and Steelers played the pass more often than not...

Also with Mularkey, we throw a lot but only short and mid range, that isnt usefull to keep the Safeties off, going deep is, with Linehan we went deep wether we would complete it or not just cause that would keep defenses honest, right now that dink and dunk isnt accomplishing anything...

So overall I think that we would be much better of if we ran the ball, cause teams like the Bills are playing the pass, and the ocassional deep throw just to keep defenses guessing and try and hit jackpot...

Bagget surely understands this and is a Saban old timer from Mich State and also knows Linehans offense at perfection, IMO we wont fire Mularkey just so he wont give our playbook up and at season end he will be shown the door and Bagget and Garrett will fight OC spot.
did you know that the dolphins offense only had the ball for 3 minutes in the 3rd quarter,nobody can judge a proffessional cordinators job after two games,i hope writing your thread made you feel good,you need somewhat of a body of work on this team to make an accurate acessment,two games is far from that
 
Back
Top Bottom