So Be
Club Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
- Messages
- 16,572
- Reaction score
- 2,216
If we want to be realistic, Cam Wake is the only star on our team. We could say Wallace but, not based on last season. We could say Fields, and he would be #2 in my books.
We do have a number of young players, who are very solid starters, with the potential to be stars but, not proven just yet. I would include Tannehill, Miller, and Jones. Even with them, that's not much "Star Power."
I'm not sure if this is a good or bad thing with this year's team. I look at very successful teams like a GB, NE, SF, Pitt, Giants, etc, and they seem to be doing just fine without the overall star power of years gone by. Other than QB, how many actual stars does any of those teams have?
It appears to me that you have to now have a total team effort with great coaching, and stability in your schemes.
This draft is the same, many solid starters but, little (if any) star power without a lot of luck. That may be OK.
I could live with another "No Name Team" to be Special.
We do have a number of young players, who are very solid starters, with the potential to be stars but, not proven just yet. I would include Tannehill, Miller, and Jones. Even with them, that's not much "Star Power."
I'm not sure if this is a good or bad thing with this year's team. I look at very successful teams like a GB, NE, SF, Pitt, Giants, etc, and they seem to be doing just fine without the overall star power of years gone by. Other than QB, how many actual stars does any of those teams have?
It appears to me that you have to now have a total team effort with great coaching, and stability in your schemes.
This draft is the same, many solid starters but, little (if any) star power without a lot of luck. That may be OK.
I could live with another "No Name Team" to be Special.