Originally posted by Muck
In that case......
Spurrier is a god-like NFL coordinator and playcaller....not to mention head coach. His protection schemes are excellent, just ask his QB. Amazing how after 4 consecutive losses, the Redskins finally won a game. Maybe that was because Spurrier turned over playcalling duties to his offensive coordinator that day.
:D
Actually, it's not.
It's because Seattle D coordinator Ray Rhodes is an arrogant doofus who figured he'd not blitz the Redskins because, well, it's just not his style.
Forget the fact that every other team that HAS blitzed us silly other than N. England has disrupted the offense entirely. Rhodes figured he didn't need to follow the example the league set for him. And Holmgren let him get away with it. They let Ramsey get comfortable, and he beat them.
THAT's why we beat Seatlle ... that and a huge hustle play by Laveranues Coles in causing a fumble at the goal line on an INT return that would have put us down 21-3, but instead turned out to be a touchback that we subsequently turned into an 80-yard TD drive that made it 14-10 and put is right back in the game.
So no ... it really wasn't about Spurrier on that one. It was about Seattle.
By the way ... when someone makes a comment about something, like say for instance when I did about Norv (which was said in something called "humor" - pretty cool concept, you should check it out), you might want to consider that responding, in essence, with "yeah, well, YOU'RE guy sucks, too," as you did, colors your debating skills with the patina of middle-school.
If you want to talk about the
Redskins, hey, ask away, and I'll tell you my opinions. Unless of course you're one of those fans who already knows everything there is to know about someone else's team, and doesn't have the need to hear from someone who actually follows them.