OC for Phins is full of Mularkey | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

OC for Phins is full of Mularkey

R

robertlo

Practice Squad
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Age
57
Last year when the Bills had 1st and goal from the 5, we took Wllis Mcgahee out of the line up and tried to be cute. Result, field goal attempt or turnovewr. This should sound familiar to Phin fans. It's not Cpep, its your OC Mularkey. I was so happy he left us last season. Even happier he was hired by the Phins. I can hear it now,"what kind of play call was that!?!?!?" Good luck the rest of the way.


Buffalo Bob
 
well when your o-line can not move the D-Line even 1 yard back, you have to be "cute".

Most teams would love to just run it in for a TD, but not every team has a O-Line that can do that on a regular basis.
 
ch19079 said:
well when your o-line can not move the D-Line even 1 yard back, you have to be "cute".

Most teams would love to just run it in for a TD, but not every team has a O-Line that can do that on a regular basis.
Click to expand...

Just wanted you to know I really respect you as an opposing fan, and agree with a lot of the things you say

Our playcalling hasnt been the best, but it hasnt been terrible.

In other words it hasnt been full of Milarkey, its been full of missed blocks, dropped balls, players losing their footing. etc. Not sure how you blame that on playcalling. In fact last weeks 2 pt conversion play call would have worked if Booker didnt fall
 
What A Bunch Of Mularkey

Could not agree with you more. Please read below for my thoughts on the subject. It reminds me of the guy who digs through my garbage every week looking for something salvagable. That would be the Phins hiring Mularkey!

It would be nice to have the same OC for more than one season. I'm dizzy from all of the shuffling over the past years :(
 
We sure as hell wouldn't have a problem retaining Mularkey. Really he just needs to start running an offense which runs the ball. And goes deep more than 1 time a game. No more gadget plays. We have tried several times to run them and NONE have worked. Our o-line is bad but it was bad when Ricky ran for over 1,300 yds. because unlike mularkey's playcalling, we stuck with it and our yds. per carry went up each quarter.
 
DolphanD said:
We sure as hell wouldn't have a problem retaining Mularkey. Really he just needs to start running an offense which runs the ball. And goes deep more than 1 time a game. No more gadget plays. We have tried several times to run them and NONE have worked. Our o-line is bad but it was bad when Ricky ran for over 1,300 yds. because unlike mularkey's playcalling, we stuck with it and our yds. per carry went up each quarter.
Click to expand...

What about the reverse to chambers?

How many gadget plays have we actually run?

Do you even know what your talking about :confused:

Im lost, please clue me in.
 
I agree Mularky is not the entire problem, but untill he starts calling more running plays he IS part of the problem! Good post.
 
Alex44 said:
What about the reverse to chambers?

How many gadget plays have we actually run?

Do you even know what your talking about :confused:

Im lost, please clue me in.
Click to expand...


Personally, I hate the one where we take a 1-step drop and fake to chambers in the flat.

If I see that play again im gonna puke.
 
I didnt have a problem with Mularky until last week. Shotgun 70% of the time is unreal against that defense. Unbelievable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom