Oh no! Yet another wildcat idea... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Oh no! Yet another wildcat idea...

NYCphan

Stuck in Jetsville
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
1
Location
New York
Let me say first that people are getting a little carried away with exotic twists on the formation. Now that defenses have seen it for weeks, I think a double-reverse pitchback lateral and pass to an eligible tackle (OK, I exaggerate) is more likely to lose a bunch of yards than be successful.

Having said that, I'll join the crowd with what I think we might see:

Pennington in motion, instead of Ricky. He takes the handoff and rolls right, into a moving pocket, something like what we used to do for Marino (for those who recall that). From there, it's pretty much a conventional passing play.

My thinking is that in planning for the wildcat, a conventional pass from the QB (without handoffs or exchanges first) is the one thing that appears off the table. They may bring the safeties up, attack the line, leave receivers one-on-one, and possibly even lose track of someone like Ricky or Ronnie running free.

In other words, just when a defense thinks it can pretty much ignore the QB, put him right back into the center of the play.
 
I like it, but it sort of depends on the defensive approach.

If the defense is using Cowher's approach and "attacking the mesh point", you're going to be in trouble because you're actually giving the ball to a less agile player.

But still, I like it. With Ginn as the other wideout (not Ricky), you might be able to get him one on one downfield.
 
With Chad Pennington lined up in the slot instead of the wide receiver spot, teams will know that something different is coming from the Wildcat formation.
 
With Ginn as the other wideout (not Ricky), you might be able to get him one on one downfield.

That would be the idea. Ginn one-on-one, with no safety help, and the ball in Penny's hands without any need for running around or extra handoffs. It wouldn't need any time to develop (Penny gets the ball almost immediately), so there shouldn't be too much risk except for an incomplete pass.

It wouldn't even need to be Ginn as the primary target. Depending on the matchups, you might get someone else in a one-on-one mismatch, maybe covered by a linebacker.
 
That would be the idea. Ginn one-on-one, with no safety help, and the ball in Penny's hands without any need for running around or extra handoffs. It wouldn't need any time to develop (Penny gets the ball almost immediately), so there shouldn't be too much risk except for an incomplete pass.

It wouldn't even need to be Ginn as the primary target. Depending on the matchups, you might get someone else in a one-on-one mismatch, maybe covered by a linebacker.
Why would there be no safety help? Even if the defense went to an 8-man front, there would still be safety help in the middle of the field. Just the fact that you have Pennington going in motion reduces the possibility of the play being a run.
 
Back
Top Bottom