OL depth...what a difference... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

OL depth...what a difference...

EROCK528

Active Roster
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
130
Reaction score
177
Location
New Jersey
Where do you think we have been today with Turner, Thomas and Douglas playing the left side of the line instead of Young, Urbik and Steen. A big part of the turn-around in culture was when these 3 were cut and it paid dividend on the field with a W!
 
The 63 drinking game is officially a game that I will never have to play again, and I am very grateful for that.
 
Where do you think we have been today with Turner, Thomas and Douglas playing the left side of the line instead of Young, Urbik and Steen. A big part of the turn-around in culture was when these 3 were cut and it paid dividend on the field with a W!

The OL sucked balls all game...
 
The OL sucked balls all game...

I felt like they played OK considering the circumstances. Those circumstances being "They're backups and the Rams have the best DL in the NFL."

Steen got blown up once, and there were a couple of missed assignments / blown protection calls, but otherwise I did not see guys on rollerskates or playing matador constantly.
 
Tannehill was sacked 4 times and hit several more times but they did do a good job in the last two drives and they played hard. Pushing Landry in from 5 yards out was awesome. If thomas and turner had been playing then Tannehill would have been sacked 9 times

Ozzy rules!!
 
I felt like they played OK considering the circumstances. Those circumstances being "They're backups and the Rams have the best DL in the NFL."

Steen got blown up once, and there were a couple of missed assignments / blown protection calls, but otherwise I did not see guys on rollerskates or playing matador constantly.

Im not saying that particular OL was supposed to be good... Im just saying they played like backups, which they are...
 
About the same as we were today! Young sucks...bad. Urbik did poorly. The fact we won is amazing, but I am in no way going to say it was because of a great game these guys had.
 
Where do you think we have been today with Turner, Thomas and Douglas playing the left side of the line instead of Young, Urbik and Steen. A big part of the turn-around in culture was when these 3 were cut and it paid dividend on the field with a W!

that's racist
 
I felt like they played OK considering the circumstances. Those circumstances being "They're backups and the Rams have the best DL in the NFL."

Steen got blown up once, and there were a couple of missed assignments / blown protection calls, but otherwise I did not see guys on rollerskates or playing matador constantly.

There was actually a lot of missed assignments which was probably a big reason Gase held the playbook back.

But I agree, it wasn't Dallas Thomas getting smacked around or Billy turner whiffing and letting his guy go right by him.
 
The line was not very good. That's why we couldnt score before then. Hopefully the line gets healthy. We can't beat Baltimore with this line currently
 
Lolwut???

I'm sure. Or at least I hope I'm sure, he's being a jokester. A jester. The funny man. I'm pretty sure. But these days? **** who knows? Folks are always looking for reason to pretend that they are butthurt. But I prefer to believe that he's joking.
 
I went back and watched the last two offensive drives. The OL did a good job blocking. Young and Urbik worked well together. Steen had some good plays here and there including a massive block downfield that freed up Landry to be pushed into the end zone. The right side struggled more in pass protection, but they were good enough.
 
Back
Top Bottom