vinivedivichi
So you're telling me there's a chance...
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 1,133
- Reaction score
- 1
- Age
- 41
I'm not really surprised by the anti-Gus sentiment on the board, but I am surprised that you guys are down on Saban for starting Gus. Saban was forced to make a decision based on who could give us the best opportunity to win games this year. Sadly, that man is Gus. I would love to think that we had a better option, but we don't.
Speculation that Gus/Saban=Jay/Wanny is ridiculous. Wanny had 5 years to find a replacement for a mediocre quarterback and didn't. Saban inherited a team without a lot of things, and is working to fill some of those holes. He found a stop-gap at quarterback to help us win games this year, but that's the extent of Gus. The assumption that Saban is playing Gus for any other reason than he gives us the best chance to win is off-base. As hard as it may be to accept, Gus is the guy that gives us the best chance to win games right now.
My point is that there's no problem with bashing Gus. He is what he is. He's a journeyman quarterback that fills a short term need for us. He's not our quarterback of the future, and I seriously doubt he's even our quarterback of the near future. I don't think, however, that it's fair to bash Saban for starting Gus. Everyone knows the learning curve for a quarterback in a new offense. If we have to go with a stop-gap, why not get a guy who's learning curve will be much smaller due to a history in the offense?
If you are bashing Saban for not starting Sage/Feeley, then you are fighting a losing battle. Even given our offensive defeciencies, it was apparent last year that Feeley has no business starting in the NFL. I'd like to think Sage has some potential, but if you're a budding star you don't manage to get overlooked by 3 coaching staffs. Sage could be a future Gus, but that's probably a best case scenario for him.
Speculation that Gus/Saban=Jay/Wanny is ridiculous. Wanny had 5 years to find a replacement for a mediocre quarterback and didn't. Saban inherited a team without a lot of things, and is working to fill some of those holes. He found a stop-gap at quarterback to help us win games this year, but that's the extent of Gus. The assumption that Saban is playing Gus for any other reason than he gives us the best chance to win is off-base. As hard as it may be to accept, Gus is the guy that gives us the best chance to win games right now.
My point is that there's no problem with bashing Gus. He is what he is. He's a journeyman quarterback that fills a short term need for us. He's not our quarterback of the future, and I seriously doubt he's even our quarterback of the near future. I don't think, however, that it's fair to bash Saban for starting Gus. Everyone knows the learning curve for a quarterback in a new offense. If we have to go with a stop-gap, why not get a guy who's learning curve will be much smaller due to a history in the offense?
If you are bashing Saban for not starting Sage/Feeley, then you are fighting a losing battle. Even given our offensive defeciencies, it was apparent last year that Feeley has no business starting in the NFL. I'd like to think Sage has some potential, but if you're a budding star you don't manage to get overlooked by 3 coaching staffs. Sage could be a future Gus, but that's probably a best case scenario for him.