warren4prez
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 715
- Reaction score
- 404
Yeah, what he said.Stay at 6 and get our playmaker. I'm fine with this.
Yeah, what he said.Stay at 6 and get our playmaker. I'm fine with this.
Don't be surprised if they go defense if they can't trade down.This pretty much leaves Denver as the lone top 10 team, that seems to have interest in trading up. The leverage is now on Denver's side, unless another team behind them starts gaining traction. It appears Atlanta and Detroit will need to make their selections at #4 and #7.
Does Atlanta select a QB or either Pitts or Chase? This could get worrisome for Miami?
This hurts our ability to drop down from 6 to either 8 or 9. I suspect we stand pat at 6 and take our guy.This pretty much leaves Denver as the lone top 10 team, that seems to have interest in trading up. The leverage is now on Denver's side, unless another team behind them starts gaining traction. It appears Atlanta and Detroit will need to make their selections at #4 and #7.
Does Atlanta select a QB or either Pitts or Chase? This could get worrisome for Miami?
Agreed, and it would probably be CornerDon't be surprised if they go defense if they can't trade down.
Denver and New England would be the top two contenders for a trade up. There is also the possibility of Chicago looking to secure a guy for the future. I saw it mentioned that there were reports that Washington had also shown trade interest in Darnold. There are still plenty of teams who would potentially be interested in moving to 4 for a QB.No need for Denver to trade up to 4 now right? Unless there is a fear of someone like NE jumping in front of them for the 4th QB
Wow! thats it?! And here I was worried they give up a 1st or 2nd lolIm not sure the price they paid takes them out of looking for a QB... only a 6th in this draft...