QB Ratings - Feeley vs. Frerotte | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

QB Ratings - Feeley vs. Frerotte

Rich

Seasoned Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
962
Reaction score
1
First 2 games - Frerotte played good, Feeley didn't
Last 2 games - Feeley played good, Frerotte didn't

http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/AFC/PYDS/2005/pre
http://www.miamidolphins.com/lockerroom/playerstatistics/playerstatisticspre.asp
NAME ATT. CMP. YDS. PCT. TD INT LG SACK RATING
G. Frerotte 74 33 384 44.6 1 1 44 4/33 59.7
A. Feeley 54 34 280 63.0 1 1 36t 1/7 74.6
B. Berlin 21 15 191 71.4 1 1 49 0/0 95.5
S. Rosenfels 27 17 152 63.0 2 1 24 1/9 87.3


All 4 qb's have 1 int. Rosenfels has 2 td's. Berlin has the highest rating.

It's kind of Ironic, that if you ranked by qb rating... you would get:
1. Berlin
2. Rosenfels
3. Feeley
4. Frerotte

Whereas our depth chart has the opposite.
 
Not surprising.

1. Berlin (fourth string defenses)
2. Rosenfels (third string defenses)
3. Feeley (second string defenses)
4. Frerotte (first string defenses)

All this proves is that we have excellent depth at wide receiver, and curiously enough...offensive line.
 
Rich said:
First 2 games - Frerotte played good, Feeley didn't
Last 2 games - Feeley played good, Frerotte didn't

http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/AFC/PYDS/2005/pre
http://www.miamidolphins.com/lockerroom/playerstatistics/playerstatisticspre.asp
NAME ATT. CMP. YDS. PCT. TD INT LG SACK RATING
G. Frerotte 74 33 384 44.6 1 1 44 4/33 59.7
A. Feeley 54 34 280 63.0 1 1 36t 1/7 74.6
B. Berlin 21 15 191 71.4 1 1 49 0/0 95.5
S. Rosenfels 27 17 152 63.0 2 1 24 1/9 87.3


All 4 qb's have 1 int. Rosenfels has 2 td's. Berlin has the highest rating.

It's kind of Ironic, that if you ranked by qb rating... you would get:
1. Berlin
2. Rosenfels
3. Feeley
4. Frerotte

Whereas our depth chart has the opposite.

Like Saban said though, stats are misleading...
 
ckparrothead said:
Not surprising.

1. Berlin (fourth string defenses)
2. Rosenfels (third string defenses)
3. Feeley (second string defenses)
4. Frerotte (first string defenses)

All this proves is that we have excellent depth at wide receiver, and curiously enough...offensive line.


Yea, but Berlin is a rookie and Sage has a few years here. I'm surprised Berlin doesn't get more credit. I hope Saban keeps him and dumps Sage. Sage is a career #3, and we should find out if Berlin does in fact have more to offer after a year or two under Garret and Scott.
 
bigmiamifan said:
Yea, but Berlin is a rookie and Sage has a few years here. I'm surprised Berlin doesn't get more credit. I hope Saban keeps him and dumps Sage. Sage is a career #3, and we should find out if Berlin does in fact have more to offer after a year or two under Garret and Scott.

I would rather keep Sage and dump AJ!
 
ckparrothead said:
1. Berlin (fourth string defenses)
2. Rosenfels (third string defenses)
3. Feeley (second string defenses)
4. Frerotte (first string defenses)

That and Gus is more willing to throw the deep ball than AJ. To make a choice purely on stats is a bad idea.
 
ckparrothead said:
Not surprising.

1. Berlin (fourth string defenses)
2. Rosenfels (third string defenses)
3. Feeley (second string defenses)
4. Frerotte (first string defenses)

All this proves is that we have excellent depth at wide receiver, and curiously enough...offensive line.

First, Frerotte and Feeley both played poorly the second game. Frerotte is looking at about 1 good game out of 4, and Feeley at 2 out of 3. I won't count Chicago either way.

And then there's the good ol' "not first string" straw man. Between first-string and second string, there is not a significant drop in performance. Berlin did well against guys who won't make the team, but he was also playing with guys who won't make the team. That's why it's actually not bad. Feeley played against NFL-caliber guys who probably aren't starter material. Feeley played with some guys who might start, some guys who might be backups, and some guys who will never play a down in the NFL.
 
bigmiamifan said:
Sage is a career #3, and we should find out if Berlin does
But this is a blessing and a curse. It's great, because you know what you get in Sage (a very capable backup). It's bad because he holds down a roster spot and you can't develop another player. Personally, I wouldn't mind cutting Sage, but I would hope it would be for a guy a little more promising than Berlin.
 
ckparrothead said:
Not surprising.

1. Berlin (fourth string defenses)
2. Rosenfels (third string defenses)
3. Feeley (second string defenses)
4. Frerotte (first string defenses)

All this proves is that we have excellent depth at wide receiver, and curiously enough...offensive line.




berlin played more against the thrid string then 4th but yes he did play against some 4th string
 
flintsilver7 said:
4th and 5 is preferable to 4th and 9. Four yards can make a difference in many places.

To my eyes, that's the Dave Wannstedt approach to 3rd-and-long.

Not saying that approach is wrong. I'm just a fan, not a football pro. I'm just making an observation.
 
Back
Top Bottom