phinpunk14
Rock and/or Roll
nikeair497 said:Shut Up.
Awwww. That's so cute. Looks like someone got their feelings hurt.
nikeair497 said:Shut Up.
oh i heard a better one yesterday. when i was commenting on Feeley's INT, the feeley homers were trying to defend feeley by saying the INT wasn't his fault.SuperDuperFan said:what you guys fail to realize is that who he was playing against makes no difference. Its frustrating to read the claims that he was playing against scrubs cause people who say that do not know football and shouldnt be here.
If you actually watched the game Feeley through his balls AT THE DIRT. Rosenfels through his into spots where only his recievers could get them. I did not matter who they were up against. It would have been the same outcome either way. Why cant people understand that?
nikeair497 said:Oh yes I have severly gone over the line. Please chain me to a fence and beat me with a pole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikeair497
Next the feely supporters will start spamming topics of
#1 Well they both suck, was recievers fault... cornerback got a lucky jump.
#2 keep feely in so we can groom him for a trade next year.. and draft qb!
#3 IM SORRY BUT ERASE THAT 1 INT AND HIS STATS ARE STILL GOOD!
#4 ...can our recievers get open?
#5 hi.. can we start handing off to ronnie or ricky.. they need reps
followed directly by...
Quote:
Originally Posted by cnyphinfan
Does anyone think that the INT may have been the receivers fault? He didn't even look and Feeley got hit when he threw the ball. Just a thought!
SuperDuperFan said:what you guys fail to realize is that who he was playing against makes no difference. Its frustrating to read the claims that he was playing against scrubs cause people who say that do not know football and shouldnt be here.
If you actually watched the game Feeley through his balls AT THE DIRT. Rosenfels through his into spots where only his recievers could get them. I did not matter who they were up against. It would have been the same outcome either way. Why cant people understand that?