Buddwalk said:Great player but not a clutch player which hurts his stock imo. Going back to the sonics signifies hes not gonna win a championship there...that team just aint even in the top 10 best teams playing now
Michael Redd will go to the cavs...trust me
Buddwalk said:Great player but not a clutch player which hurts his stock imo. Going back to the sonics signifies hes not gonna win a championship there...that team just aint even in the top 10 best teams playing now
Michael Redd will go to the cavs...trust me
finfansince72 said:Redd might make more money being with LeBron in the long run. Alot of endorsements that he wouldnt get playing for a 30win Bucks team. The money might be closer than you think in the long run. Im sure LeBron has Nike or whoever offering him money to go to Cleveland-not that anyone does that in the NBA.
GreenMonster said:I agree with you on the extra funds he could get for being with Lebron. But something tells me that Lebron may not be in Clev. for the long run. The Bucks were in the playoffs the year before our starting PG went out for the year. With Ford back and now Bogut the Bucks have a good chance to make major strides in the East. The Bucks starting 5 may be better than the Cavs next year if Redd stays.
PG - Ford
SG - Redd
SF - Mason
PF - Smith
C - Bogut
PG - McInnis
SG - Lebron
SF - Newble
PF - Gooden
C - Ilgauskas
phunwin said:Let's not get carried away. For one thing, LeBron could play with me and three of my friends and be better than the Bucks were last year. Bogut (the only significant addition the Bucks will make) is the most pro-ready rook in the draft, and he's probably not going to be as productive as Ilgauskas next year. Also, I think that Luke Jackson (2004 lottery pick) will probably take the 3 spot away from Newble next year unless LeBron gets moved there.
The Cavs have a TON of money to burn, and will be upgrading somewhere. While I don't think they'll get Redd, they'll get someone, as they're by far the most appealing option with a lot of cap room.