It's so sad that all some Miami fans have is offering excuses about why the Jets are a top team.
When someone keeps shouting empty, meaningless bull**** all the time, it gets old eventually,and sensible people will just tune it out.
"The Jets get all the lucky breaks ... the Jets haven't beaten anyone good ... The ref missed the call ... Sanchez sucks" ... etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97f5h5YSHxA&feature=fvwrel
HEY EVERYBODY ... don't be fooled by Green Bay's 8-0 record. they're really not that good. they beat 5 bad teams and only beat 3 teams with winning records ... Chicago, Atlanta and New Orleans ... but those teams aren't any good either ...
Chicago only beat ONE team with a winning record ... Atlanta ... but that doesnt count becuase Atlanta really sucks anyway ... because THEY only beat one team with a winning record. so how can Chicago be good if the only "good" team they beat, isn't even good??
New Orleans only beat two teams with winning records ... Houston and Chicago ... but Chicago doesnt count, because i already proved that they're not good ... because they only beat Atlanta ... who really isnt good because they only beat Detriot plus four losing teams ...
so like i said ... Green Bay really isn't that good ... because they haven't beaten anybody who's good ... unless you consider Chicago, Atlanta and New Orleans good ... but you can't because I already showed you that they weren't good ... because 99% of the teams they beat we're bad.
so if Green Bay isn't good, and they're 8-0 I guess nobody is good.
Hey ... these are facts I'm giving you. if I said something that isn't true, tell me.
sorry but that's how it works ... if you don't believe me, just ask The New Guy.
why hasn't this thread been stickied yet?
Where are all the Pats fans? It is too quiet for Jets week. Think the Jets can make it 3 losses in a row for NE? I don't, but I hope so.
Edwards > Burress
Cotchery > Kerley
Richardson > Conner
Woody > Hunter
1. Burress > Edwards
2. Kerley > Cotchery
3. Conner > Richardson
4. Hunter > Woody
Please don't give me the BS where you state Jets can win if they do this this and that. Just a simple prediction, so I can burn it down once you are proven wrong. You seem to jump on other people's predictions very quickly and always contradict on your own prediction with in the same sentence such as: Jets can go 6-3 in the next 9 games, but I can also seem them at 5-4 or even 4-5. Thats not a prediction. Man up and tell us exactly what you expect out of the Jets team and their offense. Do you think this Jets offense will stink against Patriots? Or do you give another prediction such as "Jets offense can play good but thats because they will be playing against Patriots D. But if they turn it over a couple of times, I can see them crashing down with 200 total yards."...
Man up New Guy, I will give u a taste of your own medicine. (and please don't quote your opinions to be facts. Calling a 4-4 KC team terrible is not a fact, its an opinion I would tend to agree with too.) Learn the difference between Fact and opinion first.
Edwards > Burress.
All you need to know is that Burress is 34 and Edwards is 28. It doesn't matter what Edwards is doing in SF. What he would have done in NY is the only thing that matters. Burress' receiving yards are pedestrian, and he more than doubled his TD production in 1 game. He is a good redzone target, but he is not explosive like Edwards was and can't stretch the field. The Jets didn't sign Burress because they thought he was an upgrade to Edwards.
Kerley and Cotchery:
Kerley is young and has shown potential to be better than Cotchery was. I don't think you can say he is better than Cotch was after just 4 games. Cotch made big plays for NY last season. Cotch was the Jets leading receiver (only comparing WRs) in the playoffs in 09, and the 2nd leading receiver in 10.
Richardson and Woody:
Both of those guys are retired, so obviously the Jets had to do something. You can't fault the Jets for that, as moves had to be made. That does not mean that the players that replaced them are playing as well as they did in the past. I personally don't think Conner is playing as well as Richardson did, or Hunter is as good as Woody was, but the Jets really didn't have a choice.
I like to deal with the facts, and the facts are things can change. Just becasue a team is playing bad does not mean that they will continue to play bad the rest of the season. You so badly want a prediction from me so you can prove me wrong, but no one can predict the future. They are just opinions. My opinions are not facts. Hints the g*y smiley (as you like to call them) after I made that statement.
If you want my opinion, I'll give it to you. What you call good offense is very different from what I call good offense. I don't just go by how many points are on the scoreboard, I watch them play. NE D is allowing more points than Buff is, so The Jets should be able to put points on the board. This game will ride on the Jets D. I think NE wins it. Even if the Jets win this game, I don't think they will win the division. NE has the exact same schedule as the Jets with the exception of 1 game. The Pats have Indy at home, and the Jets have NYG. I think the Jets are more likely to lose a game they should win than the Pats are. I think the Jets will win 10 games, and NE will win 11.
I think I am the only one that does know the difference between an opinion and a fact. I will dispute opinions, but never the facts.
I thought Sanchez was a bust and Alex Smith is better than Sanchez? Why does it matter then? SF has a good OL as well. Burress' receiving yards are pedestrian but thats because he was rusty. He is getting better incase you missed some football lately. Edwards is different type of receiver. He's explosive. Burress isn't. That doesn't mean Burress is not better than Edwards. Burress has outplayed Edwards and thats what matters to me.
lol, lets be a little more consistent. You claimed that your opinions are pretty much a fact.
Calling a 4-4 team a bad team is not a fact. Calling an offense good or bad is ALWAYS an opinion.
I think you must be the only guy that would take Burress over Edwards.
Including the playoffs, Edwards, Holmes, and Cotchery combined for 2,520 yards 19TDs. Even with 4 more games to play this year (no suspension for Holmes) I doubt that Holmes, Kerley and Burress come close to that. When you have an explosive receiver, it opens things up for other players. I will take Edwards over Burress 10 out of 10 times. If Burress was 28, it might be a different story.
Seriously? You refer to me as a kid, yet I feel like that is exactly what I am dealing with when I debate you.
There is a quote button for a reason. Please use it! I never said calling a 4-4 team bad is a fact. I don't know what you would call them at that point, but good is not one of my options. If you are 4-4 and have struggled and lost to bad teams, you are not playing good.
Calling an offense good or bad is not always just an opinion.
That is not a fact, but just my opinion. They are pretty much close to being the same thing though.
I thought u dealt with facts? Fact is, a rusty Burress has outplayed a young Edwards this year. What happened last does not make a difference this year. Edwards has been sh*t in SF. Hasn't had any impact play yet and he was on a one year prove it deal. Don't like facts anymore?
Seriously what? I pointed you out where u said your opinions are pretty much facts. Whats childish about that? That I keep pointing you out with ur childish posts?
lol, lets be a little more consistent. You claimed that your opinions are pretty much a fact.
calling an offense good or bad is ALWAYS an opinion because what might be a good offense according to you, can be an average offense according to someone else. Wrong again.
Here's one post...I can't find the other where you said SD is an average team and KC(Im pretty sure it was KC) is a bad team and claimed it a fact. I'll quote if I come across it, unless u changed it.
Yes, the fact is Burress (who has played in all 8 games) has better stats than Edwards. When you compare a free agent signing, you want it to be an upgrade over what you replaced. Just because the guy you replaced has a bad season with a new team does not mean that the guy you signed was an upgrade. You want the guy you signed to produce at least as good as the guy you replaced did the year before. How Edwards plays in SF has nothing to do with it.
You really believe that I think my opinions are facts? I already told you they are not, which would give most adults a clue that I was being sarcastic. The other clue was the big blue smiley face after I made that statement. Instead of getting that, you say:
You are so eager to try and prove me wrong that you totally ignore the obvious.
An offense can't be good and average at the same time. You may think an offense is good, and I might think an offense is average. One of us is right, and one of us is wrong, or we are both wrong, but both of us can't be right. So, someone's opinion can also be a fact.
SD is an average team. I haven't changed anything. You however, changed my quote by deleting the blue smiley that was at the end of it.