ummmm have to disagree on this one.....the ref that signaled touchdown COULD NOT SEE THE BALL.....do you understand that???? HE COULD NOT SEE THE BALL.....it was fumbled ONE YARD BEFORE THE ENDZONE....and YET he was quick to signal the play dead and call a touchdown. not just a simple mistake but A CLEAR disregard for the rules that apply to his JOB. and the man was ****ing from pittsburgh. give me a break. in addition HOW THE **** DO OFFICIALS DETERMINE WHO RECOVERS A BALL IN A PILE????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? BY WHO COMES OUT OF THE ****ING PILE THANK YOU!!!!!!! THERE WAS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF THE RECOVERY ON TAPE....MORE CLEAR EVIDENCE THAN ON A NORMAL RECOVERY ON THE FIELD IN FACT. this was NOT a case where they followed the rules and CERTAINLY not the SPIRIT of the rule (which of course is actually most important) this is a case where an official used the wording of a rule to FIT THEIR DESIRED OUTCOME and HID behind the rulebook and the NFL covered it up as if there is no conspiracy so it simply goes away....so people will forget about it and be appeased.....just like the tuck rule....EVERYBODY KNOWS WE GOT ****ED and the NFL covered it up......and i personally believe the officials in this game had an agenda
