i think they got Flo and Hoops mixed up.
If they really were targeting Parsons with that first pick, they would have stayed at 12, IMO. He’s projected to go in the 10-15 range.
The move up to 6 suggests they’re targeting one of the top four offensive playmakers, which will likely all be gone by the 10th pick.
Parson is worth a top 10 pick regardless of the valuepak group's continued droning
He's not a sexy pick but he could anchor a D for the next decade. I doubt he's picked at 6 but I could see them move up for him.
I wonder how many fans thinking Parsons is great actually watched everyone of his games?
If they did they would know almost every sack he got was plays where he was unblocked and never had to use a move to beat a blocker.
Same with most of his tackles for loss.
He is a good player.
Great players make great plays against elite teams. Against Ohio State he was average.
Maybe they draft him at #18. That might be ok.
But astute ex GM analysts do not have him on their top 10 player lists.
He's not a sexy pick but he could anchor a D for the next decade. I doubt he's picked at 6 but I could see them move up for him.
To save me the time of researching through all your other posts, who are the 6?
Pitts, Chase, Smith, Waddle — I’m guessing for sure (Unless you’re not including Pitts in the WR mix).
Who do you consider the other 2 or 3 good bets?
I have him top 5 on my board. Just trying to soften the blow for some so said top 10.top 5 worthy outside of possible character and qb
in any class