Rgiii vs luck vs tannehill vs weeden | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Rgiii vs luck vs tannehill vs weeden

twix2500

twix2500

Active Roster
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
1,362
Reaction score
17
What is your first impression and comparison of the top 3 drafted QBs of this past draft??

[video=youtube;HRVKe4y8DAY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVKe4y8DAY[/video]
Ryan Tannehill
14-of-21 passing
167 yards
1 TD - 0 INT
106.6 rating.

[video=youtube;MfK9WO71icQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfK9WO71icQ[/video]
Robert Griffin III
4-of-6 passing
70 yards
1 TD - 0 INT
145.8 rating

[video=youtube;vxQ2a69WSsM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxQ2a69WSsM[/video]
Andrew Luck
10-of-16 passing
188 yards
2 TDs 0 INTs
142.7 rating

[video]http://www.nfl.com/videos/auto/0ap2000000048841/Browns-vs-Lions-highlights[/video]
Brandon Weeden
3-for-9 passing
62 yards
0 TD - 1 INT
 
If I had to rank their performances.

4. Weeden
3. RGIII
2. Tannehill
1. Luck

Weeden looked stiff and confused - I don't think he's as NFL ready as some draft experts stated. I thought RGIII made some pretty nice, simple throws but I thought Tannehill looked much more comfortable. Tannehill did play only the 2's though, so I'd like to see if he can move the ball against a starting NFL defense. Andrew Luck looked incredible today - he just might be the next elite quarterback.
 
Just examining the first preseason game, I would say that RT is right there with Luck considering he had that TD called back. You could potentially add another completion, 15 yards(est), and a TD. They all did very well except for Weeden(he will be fine). It is only the preseason though. Let's compare notes after 3 games.
 
I said way before the draft that Weedens interceptions were a concern and I stick with that..

Luck looked unreal. RG3 very solid. Tannehill very composed and combined touch with velocity and accuracy.
 
Luck is a god damn animal. All pro caliber once in a generation player.

Tannehill could be really good. Kid has real potential.

Weeden will likely be trash, decent at best IMHO. Has the definate disadvantage of being a member or the Cleveland Browns.

Bob Griffin ****ing blows. No team will ever win a damn thing that matters with him as their QB.
 
weeden never took contact at okla st...he's in for a totally different game in the pros...especially in that division...he better have a feel for the pocket and pressure cause he's gonna be under a ton of it...
 
Could be another bumper crop for stud QBs .. but with one more success than Losman
 
Id say 1 Luck and a very very close 2 Tannehill because that 63 yd td by Luck was all luck lol, all donald brown really.... so luck had 1 real td like Tanny did....then 3 Griffin III and 4 Weeden
 
Luck is so nasty. I'm really happy with Tannehill, but he didn't look anywhere close to as good as Luck. And that's not surprising.
 
WVDolphan said:
Luck is a god damn animal. All pro caliber once in a generation player.

Tannehill could be really good. Kid has real potential.

Weeden will likely be trash, decent at best IMHO. Has the definate disadvantage of being a member or the Cleveland Browns.

Bob Griffin ****ing blows. No team will ever win a damn thing that matters with him as their QB.
Click to expand...


This lmao!!
 
What is the issue everyone seems to have with just about all of the black QBs? Do they really all suck?
 
Tureo said:
What is the issue everyone seems to have with just about all of the black QBs? Do they really all suck?
Click to expand...

Im trying to figure out why anybody thinks Griffin sucks already lol
I like Luck , griffin and Tannehill, never been a fan of drafting a qb 5 years from retirement so not a fan of Weeden
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom