Rivers Revisited | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Rivers Revisited

ckparrothead

Premium Member
Joined
May 24, 2002
Messages
52,592
Reaction score
7,256
Location
Tampa, FL
Hey guys I know I haven't posted here in a long time. Sorry about that.

I just wanted to see what ya'll think about the possibility of using the #1 or #2 pick in the draft for Philip Rivers.

I know he's a Charger, but I think a trade is a possibility for a couple of main reasons.

#1. Drew Brees, whether you like him or not, is playing like an All-Pro all of the sudden. This is a team, and an offense, that should suck. OL problems, no WRs to speak of until they picked up McCardell and even then, and their QB situation was supposed to be bad. From top to bottom this is a franchise that is being run poorly, and yet the play of Brees has really elevated the franchise to contender status. They are the feel-good story of the NFL right now and that should really continue, and if they have any success in the post-season, you may see a lot more sentiment in Charger-land going with Drew Brees, rather than newcomer southerner, holdout Phil Rivers.

#2. Speaking of holdout, Phil Rivers made no friends in the San Diego front office when he held out during training camp. I believe he was the LAST rookie to get under contract, and that means something. Of course, part of the reason was because the Chargers were low-balling him badly, but he was low-balling them as well by coming out saying that he should get paid commensurate of the #1 pick in the draft. Marty Schottenheimer is probably still in love with the kid, but GM A.J. Smith may harbor some resentment for Rivers' being the last rookie to sign and making the Chargers look bad.

#3. Speaking of AJ Smith, he's a pretty young GM, not unlike Spielman. And not unlike Spielman, he's a little less bound by conservative norms than other older GMs around the league who've been around for a long time and are so sure of what is acceptable or not acceptable to do. Like Spielman, he's also prone to making...questionable?...calls. Smith has already gone on record stating that Brees will probably be franchised, since he's set to become a UFA next year, and he even gave a hint that indeed anything is possible where it concerns dumping RIVERS instead of Brees. Similar along this note, is the fact that, like I was saying, Spielman and Smith very similar in thinking, and Spielman did in fact fall in love with Phil Rivers, and the two of these guys have worked together before on the Seau deal and on the Boston deal. They know all about how to get around the barriers of trading huge-contract players with the salary cap by having Miami pay back some of the Chargers' signing bonus and bonus obligations.

#4. I think the Chargers already have 2 first round picks, don't they? One is their own, set to be a pretty low pick, another is the Giants' pick, which will be mid-first round. We will have the #1 or #2 pick in the NFL draft. There's ammo on both sides, and there's players (Alex Barron, WRs like Mike Williams and Braylon Edwards, DT Rodrique Wright) that the Chargers could use to make themselves a better team.


Overall I think we'd have a modest chance of negotiating our #1 or #2 pick for their low first round pick, in exchange for Phil Rivers, if we found ways to reduce the cap hit that the Chargers would take for trading him.

I have to be honest I have started leaning more toward a guy like Aaron Rodgers or some other physically gifted guy with a cannon arm, because I love what cannon arms can do for ya, but Rivers will have had a year of pro practice under his belt already, and I still think he could be the most successful of all the 2004 QBs.
 
Forget Rivers, sign Brees once he becomes a UFA and get someone with four years play under his belt
 
Its an interesting possibility but its not likely to happen while Speilman is GM.It would be admitting a major mistake.He staked his reputation on AJ Feeley which we gave up a early second rounder for.If we take a QB while Rick is GM it will probably be in later in the draft to back up AJ. Just as well because there are some QBs such as Orlosky and Frye that could be taken with later picks.
 
Brees is going to be franchised so we arent getting him. I dont want phillip rivers either. We need to start being realistic and stop giving away our draft picks every time something bad happens. we need to stick with our picks and draft our own qb IF we even take a qb. we already invested a 2nd rounder in AJ Feeley....... why the hell would we invest both a 1st and 2nd rounder on two unproven qbs? Thats rediculous. We need to beef up the offensive line so we can start winning ball games. If Trent Dilfer can win games behind a good offensive line....... so can AJ Feeley.


Not to mention the chargers would be out of their minds to give us one of their 1st rounders and the top prejected qb out of college from last years draft for our #1 overall. To think that would only mean your letting your miami dolphin fandom get to your head. You cant be dellusional. Teams know we are desperate now, their gonna take advantage of us if we trade... I say we dont trade anymore because every trade we've made this year has been horrible.


David Boston...... Hurt, out for season
Lomar Gordon...... Hurt, out for season
AJ Feeley...... didn't even start season as #1 qb, and doing HORRIBLE

need i say more?

Jamar Fletcher and Adewale Ogunleye are both flourishing with their new teams.
 
You KNOW I love that scenario.

Here's my problem...WE HAVE NO QB AT THE PRESENT TIME. I have faith in feeley and SINCERELY hope he's hte answer, but he's not playing well. There are NO QB's in the upcoming draft of Rivers calibre NONE. In fact, there's no OL (which we DESPERATELY need) in this draft that will change this team day 1 either. Getting rivers would give us a QB with a year of pro-practice time, who had a sensational college career, and cinnamon rolls are burning will take this up later!
 
ckparrothead said:
#2. Speaking of holdout, Phil Rivers made no friends in the San Diego front office when he held out during training camp. I believe he was the LAST rookie to get under contract, and that means something. Of course, part of the reason was because the Chargers were low-balling him badly, but he was low-balling them as well by coming out saying that he should get paid commensurate of the #1 pick in the draft. Marty Schottenheimer is probably still in love with the kid, but GM A.J. Smith may harbor some resentment for Rivers' being the last rookie to sign and making the Chargers look bad.
Before we would even consider Rivers, though, I would want to have a couple of questions answered first. Is he a head case? If he has stirred up so much bad blood in San Diego, who's to say that he won't do it again? He could be another Ryan Leaf waiting to happen. And where is he in his development? Yes, one season of carrying a clipboard can be beneficial and is a luxury that most teams can't afford anymore. But has it done Rivers any good?
 
I said the same thing last week. Rivers is probably better than any QB in this coming draft. If Miami is going to use its #1 or 2 on a QB, than why not go for Rivers? Its still a long shot- and San Diego signed Rivers to big time money. But, if they make it deep into the playoffs with Brees, I dont see how they could let him go.. or keep both of them.
 
Finsperfect72 said:
Before we would even consider Rivers, though, I would want to have a couple of questions answered first. Is he a head case? If he has stirred up so much bad blood in San Diego, who's to say that he won't do it again? He could be another Ryan Leaf waiting to happen. And where is he in his development? Yes, one season of carrying a clipboard can be beneficial and is a luxury that most teams can't afford anymore. But has it done Rivers any good?

This guy is FAR from a head case. He's as level headed a player as you'll find. He got married, took his team to the gator bwol, all while going to college. He has a young daughter and got married BEFORE he got his the girl knocked up (seems to be a rarity these days).

The holdout was NOT his fault. Did you see the contract? it was BOGUS as hell. They kept saying "it's bigger than gallery's contract" yet something like 20 mil was wrapped up in clauses like he HAD to go to the pro-bowl AND win the superbowl EACH OF HIS FIRST 3 YEARS. It was a rediculous contract that NO ONE would have signed. Utterly stupid on San Diego's part. these people have a history of pulling bull **** contracts on their players, no one can blame Rivers for not signing it. He's FAR from a head case, like I say he's a smart ballplayer. Kept out of trouble, and knows his stuff. Just watch he will be big.
 
It would be an interesting proposition, except for one thing. San Diego would never do it. It would wreck their cap structure. Rivers got a signing bonus of over $10 million and a 6 year contract. By trading him now, all of that guaranteed money will accelerate to their cap next year. It simply isn't a realistic trade proposition.

Now, if Miami wanted to do a deal to get Brees, then San Diego would likely work something out. There will be much less of a cap hit involved by signing and then trading Brees.
 
KBISBACK said:
It would be an interesting proposition, except for one thing. San Diego would never do it. It would wreck their cap structure. Rivers got a signing bonus of over $10 million and a 6 year contract. By trading him now, all of that guaranteed money will accelerate to their cap next year. It simply isn't a realistic trade proposition.

Now, if Miami wanted to do a deal to get Brees, then San Diego would likely work something out. There will be much less of a cap hit involved by signing and then trading Brees.

yeah, but couldn't they rework it? I'd immagine Rivers would love to play here, young guy, new coach, new system, meaning they'll build around him. If they restructure him low, trade him, and we resign him to a new contract they could avoid the nasty cap hit. If i'm correct.
 
Phinzone said:
This guy is FAR from a head case. He's as level headed a player as you'll find. He got married, took his team to the gator bwol, all while going to college. He has a young daughter and got married BEFORE he got his the girl knocked up (seems to be a rarity these days).

The holdout was NOT his fault. Did you see the contract? it was BOGUS as hell. They kept saying "it's bigger than gallery's contract" yet something like 20 mil was wrapped up in clauses like he HAD to go to the pro-bowl AND win the superbowl EACH OF HIS FIRST 3 YEARS. It was a rediculous contract that NO ONE would have signed. Utterly stupid on San Diego's part. these people have a history of pulling bull **** contracts on their players, no one can blame Rivers for not signing it. He's FAR from a head case, like I say he's a smart ballplayer. Kept out of trouble, and knows his stuff. Just watch he will be big.
Thanks for the details, Phin. You make a strong case. While I'm a proponent of incentives for rookies, San Diego's offering does sound pretty insane. I just want to make sure we don't wind up with any more head cases; we've had more than our share in the past few years. I'm also concerned that he's only sitting because Brees is hot and not because he can't make the transition to the NFL. I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just curious.
 
Brees will not be francised by the Chargers , he will be a walk away free agent at the end of the year. This will Rivers team next year. The Chargers took this chance we they drafted Rivers, and now they will have to deal with it next year. Brees has stepped up this year, and he will reap the rewards next year with his new team.
 
Fin Fan in Cali said:
Brees will not be francised by the Chargers , he will be a walk away free agent at the end of the year. This will Rivers team next year. The Chargers took this chance we they drafted Rivers, and now they will have to deal with it next year. Brees has stepped up this year, and he will reap the rewards next year with his new team.
Sorry for the spelling and grammar it must be from not having a beer!
 
C.K., great to see you back!! For those newcomers C.K. is one of our most knowledgable posters on this site. To get Rivers moneywise would be very difficult but I'd give our #1 for him right now. I believe we need a top tier Q.B. and it's a good bet that Rivers will become just that in the coming years. Don't be a stranger buddy!
 
Finsperfect72 said:
Thanks for the details, Phin. You make a strong case. While I'm a proponent of incentives for rookies, San Diego's offering does sound pretty insane. I just want to make sure we don't wind up with any more head cases; we've had more than our share in the past few years. I'm also concerned that he's only sitting because Brees is hot and not because he can't make the transition to the NFL. I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just curious.

yeah i hear ya. Don't need another cecil on this team. It would have been Rivers team had the holdout not happened and had he gotten a full training camp. I can't remember off the top of my head how he did in pre-season, but if I remember right it was good. Bunch of short dink and dunks, but he DOES have an arm (some say it's questionable, he proved them wrong with a 53 yard pass in the senior bowl). He's not a cannon, but he's more than adequate in the arm for the NFL. The big thing about the guy is he's extremely smart. He makes flawless reads quickly, has a flash of a release, and is accurate as hell. you'll see this guy hit a receiver in stride wtiht eh receiver never missing a beat. it's really fun to watch actually getting YAC.

Breese is hot and playing, rightfuly so. He earned his postiion this year, but had he not lit it up you woud have seen Rivers come in mid-season. I was screaming that SD gave up on Breese too soon, but it's their loss I guess. They'll either franchise and deal Breese (which would be incredibly expensive) or find something to do with rivers (incredibly expensive again). Either way their losing out on a potentially great QB down the road. If Breese walks they don't get jack, if they franchise him and no one bites they are stuck with a huge contract, etc. Would be best for them to trade us rivers :)
 
Back
Top Bottom