EvilDylan
☠️ Banned ☠️
Data shows elite QBs produce regardless of Talent around them.
No, it doesn't.
Data shows elite QBs produce regardless of Talent around them.
No, it doesn't.
James Cobern has data going back to 1969 saying it does.
Everything he does is based strictly on numbers.
IOW, it's useless.
Calling Data Analytics useless is a bit extreme considering NFL teams like the Browns,Ravens and the Falcons use Analytics in every decision they make(I suspect more teams will start to use them in the future). He also watches game film too.
All right.
Tannehill has been decent. And he is getting better, MUCH better last year alone. New coach, new offense, so on and so forth.
The past is whatever. It can't be changed, so no sense dwelling on it. He is easily the best we have had since Marino. Bar none. And now he has a coach that backs him up, top end receivers, a sledgehammer running back, and a line that we all pray keeps its **** together.
So for all the "make or break" bullshit that we've heard (and said) in the past, this year truly is. Tannehill has been well set up to succeed this year. He will not be Marino Reloaded. More like Bob Griese with an arm, or Don Strock with wheels.
He's better set up than the 84 team, assuming the TE position comes around and the line clicks.
But even Marino didn't have all he needed to pan out in 1984.
And, like a guy named Terry Bradshaw once was, I'll bet he's sick of the **** and is ready to gut New England.
Make or break year for Tannehill don't tell that to the plethora of casual fans on this board that believe Tannehill is an elite QB without flaws.
I didn't call data analytics useless.
My fault If thats not that what you meant: but he is using Analytics unless you mean if the only thing your using is numbers then its useless, I still disagree.
Weak.
Almost as sad as having to beg someone else to do your homework for you.
Like I said: 2D view of a 3D environment.
If Analytics is too hard, I would be happy to explain anything you don't understand.
If Analytics is too hard, I would be happy to explain anything you don't understand.
Damn.
Digital you must be getting sick of this bs to absokutely demolish this so badly lol
Jerry, why is it you only post things like this- claim "no narrative here" yet all of your posts have common themes- misunderstanding statistics, misrepresenting statistics, or just straight up opinions from blogs
It's laughable
Thanks for the kind gesture but analytics are self-explanatory.
On the same hand, if quoting posts are too difficult to figure out, I can also offer you help.
Um Digital your arguments about offensive Line play, sack total over 4 years, coaching and lack of TE plays implies you don't get the analytics he used.Thanks Travis34.
Yeah, I am a believer in analytics. But like anything else, it's garbage in = garbage out. There is an old saying, "lies ... damned lies ... and statistics." That is because misused or improperly balanced analytics can paint a very incorrect picture. It's kinda like me putting on an official NFL jersey and thinking I'm a bona fide NFL player ... it's a farce. Hopefully one day this kid learns how to use analytics and do a proper analysis.