Ryan Tannehill Constraints

[Daytona Fin]

This is the chapter from Cian Fahey's pre snap reads publication. He put at a sample for Tannehill analysis.

http://presnapreads.com/2016/02/29/psr-sample-chapter-ryan-tannehills-constraints/

This is a sample chapter from the Pre-Snap Reads Quarterback Catalogue 2016.
The Pre-Snap Reads Quarterback Catalogue charted 16,800 pass attempts, 617 interceptable passes, 1,362 failed receptions, 3,509 Simple YAC throws and 1,037 sacks. The book charted the play of 35 quarterbacks, every single player who attempted 250+ passes during the 2015 season as well as quarterbacks of note Colin Kaepernick and Johnny Manziel.

[TWEET]704410254600175616[/TWEET]

 

[Phinatic8u]

Well that's not gonna make people around here happy

Gotta love the offseason.

 

[Sarnics13]

Oh Lord.....an article stating proven logic and facts. Here she blows!!!

Tannehaters gonna need their prozac after this one. Just chill you guys you'll be on board within a few weeks of the new season.

 

[russianbear]

guy sounds like he wrote that from a barstool

 

[Sons Of Shula]

But for the rest of us who knew this all along it's just simple clarification about our franchise QB.

 

[Brazzi]

Omg that guy is so full of bs.

Dolphins offense was "built to rely on run"?

Ryan Tannehill is awesome but the ball should not be in his hands so much?

Spinsters in the media, smh!

 

[tcdrover]

I read this one and the one on Cutler.

It seems all of his analysis is based purely on stats.

What the opponents DEFENSE is doing and whether or not the actual games were...

you know...

ACTUALLY WON.

Never seemed to factor into anything that he wrote.

RT can definitely be a winning QB with better line play and a better scheme, to me that was never the question.

My concern was never what he could not get done due to sacks and drops.

My concern is when the line holds up, the failed 3rd down conversions and lack of any creativity to extend the play or simply run for the first.

You know.. stuff tied to ACTUAL wins and losses and not simply to stats.

 

[rickd13]

Clearly a homer

 

[Bumpus]

:snack:

 

[Bumpus]

I read this one and the one on Cutler.

It seems all of his analysis is based purely on stats.

What the opponents DEFENSE is doing and whether or not the actual games were...

you know...

ACTUALLY WON.

Never seemed to factor into anything that he wrote.

RT can definitely be a winning QB with better line play and a better scheme, to me that was never the question.

My concern was never what he could not get done due to sacks and drops.

My concern is when the line holds up, the failed 3rd down conversions and lack of any creativity to extend the play or simply run for the first.

You know.. stuff tied to ACTUAL wins and losses and not simply to stats.

Well, your 2 concerns lead to ACTUAL "3rd down & Clevelands" ... Just saying.

 

[tcdrover]

Well, your 2 concerns lead to ACTUAL "3rd down & Clevelands" ... Just saying.

I'm referring to manageable 3rd downs, 8 yards or less.

Especially in the 4th Quarter, but throughout the 2nd half.

Critical 3rd down conversions and clutch plays get lost when only passing completions and yardage stats are looked at

 

[Sons Of Shula]

I'm referring to manageable 3rd downs, 8 yards or less.

FYI, 3rd & 6 is considered "long". 3rd & 8 is "very long".

So, FWIW, 3rd & 8 is not a manageable down & distance. That would be 3rd & 5 or less.

 

[FinfanInBuffalo]

I'm referring to manageable 3rd downs, 8 yards or less.

Especially in the 4th Quarter, but throughout the 2nd half.

Critical 3rd down conversions and clutch plays get lost when only passing completions and yardage stats are looked at

Does Tannehill miss more of those than other QBs? Please elaborate.

 

[roy_miami]

Dilfer is exactly right. He looks the part, which is why so many are fooled, but he is missing the intangibles that ultimately leads to more W's in the win/loss column.

 

[AgentXof12]

I read this one and the one on Cutler.

It seems all of his analysis is based purely on stats.

What the opponents DEFENSE is doing and whether or not the actual games were...

you know...

ACTUALLY WON.

Never seemed to factor into anything that he wrote.

RT can definitely be a winning QB with better line play and a better scheme, to me that was never the question.

My concern was never what he could not get done due to sacks and drops.

My concern is when the line holds up, the failed 3rd down conversions and lack of any creativity to extend the play or simply run for the first.

You know.. stuff tied to ACTUAL wins and losses and not simply to stats.

Then you obviously skipped over all the parts where he is describing plays as they happened. Like the Kenny Stills dropped deep pass.