Saban Blows It And Cuts Q. Williams? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Saban Blows It And Cuts Q. Williams?

DOLFANMIKE

Coaches Corner
Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
7,413
Reaction score
11,389
Location
SO CAL
Saban is a great coach, and seems to be a good person. BUT he isn't perfect and won't always do what we all think is right. I've said it many times on these boards, we will not usually know the whole story. So while things can seem to be real clear for us on what "he should do" with Q. Williams and T. tillman (I wanted both of them cut myself).....we always have to keep that fact in the back of our minds. We just don't know what all is involved.

(Here comes my little coaches rant) :rofl3:

Even in my little High school football world, I have situations pop up between myself and players that people on the outside just don't get. For example, I caught a player in my program (non starter....played very little and prob never will) stealing another players Football shorts last season. I really wanted to boot the kid, but I knew that the varsity head coach (I was his Var OC and JV Head coach) had caught a varsity player doing the same a month earlier and allowed him to stay on the team with a warning that any more nonsense and he was gone. So I told him that I was going to give him another chance, made him return the shorts, apologize to the kid he stole from, and I made it clear if anything else happened he was gone. Well, the last week or two of the season sure enough he was involved in something pretty minor where he showed a staff member disrespect and so I booted him. A few players and a few parents (who had no idea what had happened earlier...and I never told them as it was none of their business) really raised a stink and tried to question my decision and pressure me to allow him back not knowing that he had already had his "chance" and blown it again being dishonest and disrespectful. To this day they have no idea of the whole situation and still think I was just being a hardazz.

In my earlier days coaching, I used to think I had to make sure I explained myself in those situations at the expense of anyone that had screwed up so that I wouldnt look bad. As time has gone on, I have come to realize that while there's something reasonable about that, I think that most players or parents that want to question a coach already have a lack of trust anyhow that really arent worth wasting any time on. Their attempt to question my decision for example is just their attempt to tear down my decision making and role on the team as the disciplinarian. I also think a coach shows character in that situation by not explaining himself. It's not their place to question us on how we handle team discipline. I doubt they understand the wedge they create when players or parent do question the coaches role on team discipline. No doubt it hurts the team. It causes a pause in action on the field in tight spots when the players dont trust you, it can creat doubts in what you do or how you do it. It can be very devisive. It all comes down to the fact that they either trust and respect the job you are doing or they dont.
Most of the time, problems that come up like this are presented by people that have an axe to grind anyhow. The same is true I think of alot of fans critics on their teams coaches. They lose faith or never had it, or didn't like something and so they look for opportunities to point fingers. :shakeno:

I bet I could come up with almost one story or another each week of a season that I as a coach have something exactly like what I described happen and people have no idea why I respond to this player or parent the way I do. I think thats why as a coach you just can't let what people think of you bother you or alter any decision that you make. Even if it costs you your position. Most the coaches I know nowadays, even the really successful in demand guys (not just the new young coaches) all have the understanding that there is a strong possibility they will someday get ran out of town or leave under fire. If your losing, the odds are just higher that it will happen sooner rather than later. I say this because nobody in truth honestly believes they don't have enough talent to be a winner. They all think that they have enough talent to win and complete for league titles year after year. Nobody, especially at the level I coach, has a reality based view on the team's talent from year to year. So if things are good its because the kids are so talented, and if things are tough its that the coaches are holding the players back.

With this in mind, I like the way Saban handles his situations. I really like the way he poses questions to the media that he thinks they are asking. What would you do? Who would you draft? I love it. Because he takes one little question and puts their question right in their lap. He's not being a wise azz when he asks those questions. He's simply saying, "things are not always so black and white in my world."

No doubt there will be many things that come up with Saban where we will wonder how in the heck he came to that decision, and think he's hard or soft, because we don't know whats going on behind closed doors. For example, I've read alot on the boards lately about how good V. Carey is and how he will start for us this year at LT. I think thats great. I really hope it happens and I think our new Offensive coaches are the best we've had in a long, long time. But I heard last year that V. Carey was so dumb coming into our organization that he "couldnt open a bag of Fig Newtons to save his life if he was starving." His overall understanding of his responsiblities was so low in a system so dumbed down (vanilla) that some wondered if he was our next "Eddie Blake"... So maybe, just maybe he shouldnt have been on the field last year. Maybe he was like MOST NFL OL and wasnt ready as a rookie to play. Maybe the staff knew a bit more than we give them credit for.

I'm learning alot from Nick Saban right now watching him handle the media and fans. I would take half my current pay to work with this guy for a year or two. He really does have a strong projection and I like the way he is organizing things and handling the public in a difficult situation. I really have alot of respect for guys like Saban, JJ, Shula, and even old Wanny for getting to the level they have reached in coaching. I see how competitive it is on just the HS and small college level. I see hundreds of coaches at clinics throughout the year striving to get better and educate themselves, only to have "the all knowing fan" question every move and even X's and O's (the biggest of all the ignorant moves by fans) that these coaches use. I think thse guys deserve alot of credit for working in the environment that they are in and I can identify with them when i see all the second guessing going on. I think Saban is one of the best I've seen at handling it in the ways that he does. He takes no crap and doesnt let the wrong question slide. He puts second guessing into the lap of the person doing the second guessing.
 
Great post. I too have coached high school sports for almost 20 years, so I can relate to your comments on parental involvement and criticism.
~~Holli
 
Good post.

We don't know all the circumstances or anything else that went on. That said, I think this is a rare case where we know a large portion of it. The day before, Saban said "I really can't do anything to the players." and "What do you want to do, cut the guy??".

I'd like to have heard Saban's actual tone in that interview. And I'd really like to know about the actual process that lead to Williams release.
 
byroan said:
Why did you want Tillman cut?
I read that Tillman was with him in the car. If he was then they are both equally at fault IMO.
 
HolliFinFan said:
Great post. I too have coached high school sports for almost 20 years, so I can relate to your comments on parental involvement and criticism.
~~Holli

Coach,

Have you had anything similar to the situation I shared occur lately? Here in So Cal these are weekly events. I do know though that in 1999 when I coached in Minnesota not one situation like I described took place. The families of Edina were completely supportive of my role with the kids.

Out here though, it never ceases to amaze me how little respect parents seem to have for our profession, and how many of them, even women that are the prissy types that were never in athletics, will speak up and voice their opnion about X's and O's. Thank God my offenses have been productive over the years, because if we were struggling year after year life would have been horrible.
 
DOLFANMIKE said:
I read that Tillman was with him in the car. If he was then they are both equally at fault IMO.

Yeah he was in the car, in fact I think it might have been his car. I don't see what he did wrong though, he was drunk but not driving.
 
byroan said:
Yeah he was in the car, in fact I think it might have been his car. I don't see what he did wrong though, he was drunk but not driving.
I think you are splitting hairs. Are you telling me that the NFL Vet that owned the car had no control over the fact that a drunk was driving his car OR that if he had told QW to slow down, or not race that QW wouldnt have listened.

GIVE - ME - A - BREAK - DOLFAN! :rolleyes:
 
DOLFANMIKE said:
I think you are splitting hairs. Are you telling me that the NFL Vet that owned the car had no control over the fact that a drunk was driving his car OR that if he had told QW to slow down, or not race that QW wouldnt have listened.

GIVE - ME - A - BREAK - DOLFAN! :rolleyes:

Not one of us was there so we can't speculate on what happened.
 
DOLFANMIKE said:
Coach,

Have you had anything similar to the situation I shared occur lately?

I currently only coach tennis, which is an team sport, yet more individual. Some of the parents complain about how I do the lineup--I'm ethical. I play the best players in order of their ability. Parents want me to mix up the order against harder teams--for example, play my number two player at the number four position. Believe it or not, there is no rule against doing this, but I refuse.

I coached swimming and diving for 18 years. (I was a springboard diver.) My problems are more related to dealing with "club" coaches and parents, who don't want their athletes to practice with the team, yet just show up for matches. If we're winning, I'm doing a great job. If we're losing, I'm responsible for their spending all that money on private lessons.

The kids are great though, as are some of the parents. If not for the kids, I'd not do it anymore.

My friend at school who coaches softball experienced what you detailed this year. She kicked four senior prima donnas (two with potential D-I scholarships) off the team for not attending practice and insubordination. She gave several warnings but damn, did the chit hit the fan. The team had a horrible record, but she established herself as coach, not a pushover. I don't doubt that the team will be stronger in the long run, but she wonders if it was worth the brouhaha.
~~Holli
 
Ultimately, Quentin Williams is responsible for Quentin Williams' actions and his decision was a poor one. Travares Tillman is somewhat responsible because it was his car, but not as responsible as Quentin Williams. Period.

Also, one thing to note is that Quentin Williams was not that drunk. In a lot of states, he would not have been legally considered drunk. Florida's legal limit use to be .1 not .08, and testing out at .087 is not all that high. Tillman may have been having Williams drive because Tillman knew he was legally drunk (or way past it) and in Williams' case he may have claimed to not be legally drunk, and with Williams actually being so borderline I'm sure it would not necessarily have been obvious whether he was or not.

Tillman was probably having Williams drive for him as the D.D.

Either way. I've been in cars where the driver felt like doing a little hot-rodding, and I didn't stop it. If something bad happened, I don't feel that I was as culpable as the driver.

Plus, Tillman has more of a commitment from the Dolphins. It is reality pure and simple that his leash is longer than that of a formerly undrafted rookie FA tweener who is 6th or 7th on the depth chart and who has been struggling thus far in the system.

You don't cut a starter just because he was in the passenger seat while another teammate held a drag race. But you sure as heck could cut a guy that did that if he's on the bubble. This is how it SHOULD be too. Guys have to know that they can earn a longer leash by playing really well and getting the team to depend on them, and likewise they have to learn that if they start playing poorly and they start getting into the coach's doghouse, they will have a very short leash. Discipline is one thing, but you also have to get these players to try as hard as they possibly can on the practice and football fields, otherwise your disciplined team of good-natured philanthropists ends up just not all that good.
 
ckparrothead said:
Ultimately, Quentin Williams is responsible for Quentin Williams' actions and his decision was a poor one. Travares Tillman is somewhat responsible because it was his car, but not as responsible as Quentin Williams. Period.

Also, one thing to note is that Quentin Williams was not that drunk. In a lot of states, he would not have been legally considered drunk. Florida's legal limit use to be .1 not .08, and testing out at .087 is not all that high. Tillman may have been having Williams drive because Tillman knew he was legally drunk (or way past it) and in Williams' case he may have claimed to not be legally drunk, and with Williams actually being so borderline I'm sure it would not necessarily have been obvious whether he was or not.

Tillman was probably having Williams drive for him as the D.D.

Either way. I've been in cars where the driver felt like doing a little hot-rodding, and I didn't stop it. If something bad happened, I don't feel that I was as culpable as the driver.

Plus, Tillman has more of a commitment from the Dolphins. It is reality pure and simple that his leash is longer than that of a formerly undrafted rookie FA tweener who is 6th or 7th on the depth chart and who has been struggling thus far in the system.

You don't cut a starter just because he was in the passenger seat while another teammate held a drag race. But you sure as heck could cut a guy that did that if he's on the bubble. This is how it SHOULD be too. Guys have to know that they can earn a longer leash by playing really well and getting the team to depend on them, and likewise they have to learn that if they start playing poorly and they start getting into the coach's doghouse, they will have a very short leash. Discipline is one thing, but you also have to get these players to try as hard as they possibly can on the practice and football fields, otherwise your disciplined team of good-natured philanthropists ends up just not all that good.


He blew a .087, no doubt it may have been higher when he was originally stopped.
 
DOLFANMIKE said:
I think you are splitting hairs. Are you telling me that the NFL Vet that owned the car had no control over the fact that a drunk was driving his car OR that if he had told QW to slow down, or not race that QW wouldnt have listened.

GIVE - ME - A - BREAK - DOLFAN! :rolleyes:

Your original post is a good one, but I think there's a definite line between being a drunk driver and a drunk passenger. It's a big, thick, black line. Maybe Tillman showed poor judgment in letting Williams drive, rather than getting a cab back home, but ultimately, Williams is the only one responsible for his actions.
 
TerryTate said:
He blew a .087, no doubt it may have been higher when he was originally stopped.

Yeah, he blew that at the station house. It was definitely higher when he was driving. I mentioned the designated driver possibility on the main forum, as Tillman was indeed drunk according to FHP.

Another thing that dawned on me. As PFT mentioned, team's can't cut players for violating NFL rules. Obviously this move was most likely made due to the arrest. So perhaps Saban made the "I can't do anything to them" comment was made with the possible grievance proceedings in mind.
 
TerryTate said:
He blew a .087, no doubt it may have been higher when he was originally stopped.
Your liver processes about one shot of whiskey, one glass of wine or one beer in about an hour. It takes roughly three beers, glasses of wine, or 3 shots, to get to a .08 for an average sized man. (185-195 lbs)

A blood alcohol test would be administered as soon as they got back to the station because the police also know that alcohol metabolizes quickly from the body. If it was more than an hour between the initial stop and the BAC test, I'd be real surprised. So, if all that holds true he may have had 4 drinks.

Doesn't sound like he would have been falling down drunk or even showing any signs of intoxication other than a loss of inhibition, sound judgement, and smelly breath. Certainly no where near enough alcohol to effect his motor skills which occurs approximately .10 higher than what he was.

I'm not trying to excuse what he did. he made a stupid decision and he should pay for it in some way but, DUI laws don't make a whole bunch of sense because they don't take into account the level of intoxication when handing out penalties. Someone who gets a DUI and blows a .087 should receive a much lighter sentence than someone who blows a .24.

Sorry for the rant, these kinds of things bug me though.
 
Back
Top Bottom