San Fran negotiating with top pick

Gamble

FinHeaven VIP
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
ESPN's Clayton reports that the 49ers are talking contract with Smith, Rodgers, and Edwards. Which signing would benefit the Dolphins the most?
 

DonShula84

Sporty Don
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
13,501
Reaction score
0
Age
36
Location
Long Beach, Ca
I could see any of them helping us. If they take one of the QBs teams might want to jump ahead of Cleveland to nab the last remaining QB. If they take Edwards perhaps a team who really wants a WR will move up to take Mike Williams. Also if they take Edwards then we cant make the mistake of taking him :wink: I think them taking a QB is most realistic though
 

Prime

FinHeaven Elite
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
13,346
Reaction score
0
Location
ohio
I really hope that the Niners will pick Rodgers because that would help us out in 2 ways. Since Edwards and Smith will be there, there will be offers on the table for us that will give us some high picks.
 

JCfinfan

FinHeaven VIP
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
3,534
Reaction score
8
Gamble said:
ESPN's Clayton reports that the 49ers are talking contract with Smith, Rodgers, and Edwards. Which signing would benefit the Dolphins the most?
Definately Rodgers. I think more teams picking behind us are interested in Smith and Edwards.
 

Jaj

What you say?
Joined
Jan 22, 2003
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
0
Age
41
Location
LA
That's tough. I like both QBs quite a bit. Before I liked Rodgers more than Smith by a wide margin, but now in my mind it's almost even.
 

General Tso

Seasoned Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Location
Missouri
Gamble said:
ESPN's Clayton reports that the 49ers are talking contract with Smith, Rodgers, and Edwards. Which signing would benefit the Dolphins the most?
Edwards... so Saban can choose whomever he feels is the best QB in the draft.
 

Timmy54

Not a 3am Member but still post whoring
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
0
Location
Gainesville
Just as long as they have their contract locked before draft it is great for us. Remember, Saban wants to trade the #2 pick and with all the info for other teams all spelled out, that sale will be alot easier if SF does their part.
 

LostInPatsLand

Pro Bowler
Finheaven VIP
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
49
Age
46
The worst thing would be if they successfully trade that pick to another team we could have traded with. Second worst would be if they pick Edwards. There is a greater probability we could trade down if he's still on the board at 2.
 

Jaj

What you say?
Joined
Jan 22, 2003
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
0
Age
41
Location
LA
LostInPatsLand said:
The worst thing would be if they successfully trade that pick to another team we could have traded with. Second worst would be if they pick Edwards. There is a greater probability we could trade down if he's still on the board at 2.

Your right. They definitely need to take a QB. I'm just still not sure which though is better.
 

Rivers177

Rookie
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I think its Rodgers because the other players are all better then him. As you can tell I'm not a big fan of Rodgers he is just too much like Boller.
 
Top Bottom