I'm guessing you're looking at least 2 firsts, a couple mids and Tua. I think it will depend on Green Bay's need to get rid of him. At the end of the day, it will be less that Watson because of age and contract. The greater question is how much would you pay to be in the super bowl conversation? I've said time and again, everything is hypothetical. The cap makes it a struggle but for those that say it's a bad idea for the idea of giving draft capital, that's nuts.
Ridiculous comment. Guarantee to eliminate a question mark in the most critical position.
Take a look at their performances against quality competition. I'm sorry, they have been terrible. As my father in law and son are huge packer fans and we're season ticket holders in Green Bay, I can tell you watching them in big games for years they have had more defensive letdowns than anyone I've watched. Almost inevitably, they have been a nightmare come playoff time. They are letdown central.
Exactly, dudes cannot even hypothetically talk about it. It's hilarious. They must've invested in both the home and away jerseys of Tua.
Wait, we have a question mark at QB?
So, just to be clear, in recent previous off seasons when hypothetically discussing how to possibly upgrade the QB position whether it be Tannehill, Fitzpatrick, Moore, Lemon, Green, Harrington, Henne, Beck, Culpepper, Cutler, or Frerotte, your stance has consistently been “they are our QB, deal with it?”
Ignore function comes in handy my friend. I used it already.
Stop pretending that it's as simple as that. No sh*t Rodgers is better than Tua right now. It's about way more than that. Miami would have to weigh how much they would be willing to sacrifice in assets to acquire a guy who is in the twilight of his career and who they don't even know how he would feel about playing in Miami. There is more than the talent you see with your eyes when it comes to Rodgers. He has an abrasive personality who notoriously has had problems with many different people and seems to check out when things don't go exactly his way. No one knows how he would fit in with this team and front office. It would be a big risk changing course right now for such a young team.
Yeah, you are the only one brilliant enough to understand that it takes great QB play to win in the NFL.
See, this is a perfect example of TDS, you find flaws in the best QB in the NFL and one of the top 5-10 QBs in NFL History, because you can't just bring yourself to say that RIGHT NOW, the Dolphins would be better with Rodgers than Tua. Speculating on this in the offseason does not equate to hating on Tua. This is Aaron freaking Rodgers. Did his personality stop the Packers from going to 5 NFC Championships and winning a Superbowl in which he was the MVP, did his personality stop him from winning the MVP last year? I 100% concede he hasn't played his best in NFC Championship games, but he wasn't responsible for a historic defensive collapse against Seattle, and he didn't fumble inside his own 10 against Tampa Bay.
Rodgers guarantees nothing, but I recognize you find anything except your own opinion ridiculous.
Just curious, and obviously this is all hypothetical, but why does everyone assume Tua would even be part of a deal? The Packers drafted a QB they like in Jordan Love in the first round and I think they'd want to give him a few years to show what he can do. If we could keep Tua and let him sit behind Rodgers for 2-3 years like Rodgers did with Favre, would you be in favor of that scenario?
So Rodgers doesn't guarantee great QB play? In that case I guess no QB in the NFL would.
