I mean, we are just talking fantasy here because it's completely unrealistic that the Dolphins would trade for Rodgers, but why would it be assumed that Tua would even be part of the trade?
SB ring in next two years, get Rodgers
- Thread starter Dan13Forever
- Start date
For them, its binary thinking, either black or white. One or zero.
I want Tua to be a pro bowl QB, if we cannot get Watson or Rodgers. For them, because we want a sure thing instead of relying on 'hope', then we must want Tua to fail. And we are hating. Its so childish.
May be. However, I truly believe all the reasons we don't want Watson or Rodgers were initiated by don't want to touch Tua first.
First, don't want to touch Tua, then look for reasons to support the narrative.
There are no "sure things" here. To say that is about as "black and white", binary thinking as it gets.
I really hate to do this, but you have earned the daily double....
Last edited:
Of cause there is a sure thing, as sure as Marino was an elite QB, as sure as Brady is an elite QB. Rodgers will be sure an elite QB.
So what the hell were you talking about?
Picture reply.....not even funny.
Some may come from that starting point, no doubt.
Most of the regulars here are pretty consistent, whether I agree or not, in their overall philosophy.
Consistent enough to be taken at 'face value", rather than some conspiratorial hidden agenda.
Paranoia will destroy ya...........Kinks
A sure thing that getting any individual QB assures a championship? No such thing.
Give me a break and stop moving the goal posts with double talk.
The very thread title says SB in two years. That is NOT a sure thing.
I like you as a poster (most of the time), but you are all over the place with what appears to be merely a propensity to argue.
Call every one dumb for disagreeing with you and then call them elitist snobs?
There were a few things that happened in between those 2 things. And I didn't call everyone dumb, I called preferring present day Tua over Aaron Rodgers dumb, which might be harsh in retrospect, but it still doesn't make sense to me. Do you have anything productive to add to that discussion, or did you just want to call me out ? (which is fine).Call every one dumb for disagreeing with you and then call them elitist snobs?
Tampa had a good team before Brady arrived, he was the missing piece. I don't think we're quite at the same level Tampa was, yet.
This team has one proven above average starter on offense and doesn’t have a single pass rusher who’s ever started a full NFL season. The idea that they’re a QB away from a Super Bowl next year is delusional, especially once you need to create $30 million in cap space to fit Rodgers.
The answer isn’t giving up a trove of assets and a massive cap hit for a 37 year old quarterback.
The answer isn’t giving up a trove of assets and a massive cap hit for a 37 year old quarterback.
Just goes to show, securing a single player doesn't make a SB. We had Marino all those years and failed to field a complete team around him and what do we have to show for it? Wasted franchise QB. You'd have to cut some of the roster, where do you see us being deep enough that we have expendable players as a trade-off? Just curious...
Has nothing to do with not wanting to touch Tua in my case, I don't consider him untouchable. I just don't
think it's prudent to bring in a 37-year-old QB when the rest of our team isn't in the position to compete for a SB yet. Give me Mahomes and I drop Tua in a hot second.
Not sure, Rodgers is only showing a salary of $14 million this year and I don't know if he'd be willing to restructure with a new team. I can tell you this with 100% certainty based on history, a team is more likely to go to a SB with an elite QB and a lesser team surrounding him than an elite team with a lesser QB. Look at the last 20 years SB QBs and tell me I'm wrong.