So Be
Active Roster
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
- Messages
- 16,572
- Reaction score
- 2,216
Most, including myself, thought signing Suh to his monster deal was a good move. What are we thinking now?
Many are saying that he has crippled us on the salary cap, and that simply is not true. This year, in addition to Suh, we gave big deals to Tannehill and Pouncey with $10M left over in the bank. Next year we have to pay him a whopping $28M but, can easily clear $40m or more in cap space with no big losses affecting the future of this team. He was like signing two high priced FA for the price of one, and it's debatable at best that we could have done any better with two.
He has not had the impact which many had hoped for but, overall had a VG (not great) year. I expect to improve next year. We could have, and have, done much much worse in our FA signings.
So, in hindsight, do you still like the deal?
Many are saying that he has crippled us on the salary cap, and that simply is not true. This year, in addition to Suh, we gave big deals to Tannehill and Pouncey with $10M left over in the bank. Next year we have to pay him a whopping $28M but, can easily clear $40m or more in cap space with no big losses affecting the future of this team. He was like signing two high priced FA for the price of one, and it's debatable at best that we could have done any better with two.
He has not had the impact which many had hoped for but, overall had a VG (not great) year. I expect to improve next year. We could have, and have, done much much worse in our FA signings.
So, in hindsight, do you still like the deal?