hoops
Tua time!
:sidelol: you're getting smoked in here ilovemyfins quit while you still have some dignity
I don't read minds and you have a habit of contradicting yourself from post to post, so what do you want me to do? Get someone in here to perform a seance every time I reply to one of your posts?
Chad got hurt w/ good OLs, his body wasn't meant to play in this league but he also made OLs look better b/c he was a good decision maker and it's not like you had a really good OL in 2008. you had an outstanding LT and not much else.
The 11 win Pats (without Brady) where we unveiled the Wildcat to the world on 6 plays and produced 5 TDs on those 6 plays?
5 of our 7 losses are against the Pats, Lions, Broncos, Ravens, Packers all playoff teams and the other 2, Bills and Chiefs are against teams still in the mix. 2 of those losses the defense couldn't hold them on the last drive. The last 3 games are on the entire team not just your QB. If you go back and research how efficient the offense has been since the Albert injury you'll see how poor things have gotten. Outside of a good half against the Broncos the offense has sucked. And some dont think a key injury like that affects an entire offense. Especially when there is no depth and I am sure you agree we have none.
Of course over the last 3 games the defense is giving up 30 PPG I believe and over 400 yards. However, the unhappy adjusters seem to think that football is only played on one side of the ball and that the defense can have a picnic and plant daffodills at in the end zone instead of you know....stopping the opponent.
i restated it for u, tannehills performance is below avg vs below avg teams in the clutch, and penningtons was above avg when it mattered down the stretch.
Chad got hurt w/ good OLs, his body wasn't meant to play in this league but he also made OLs look better b/c he was a good decision maker and it's not like you had a really good OL in 2008. you had an outstanding LT and not much else.
You've seen our current OL right? I'm not bagging on CP, I'm actually a fan going all the way back to Marshall, but some people are seriously "misremembering" how the 2008 season played out.
Yep. We were better down the stretch vs bad teams in 2008 than we were in 2013. Again, that goes back to the previous contention. You're putting that all on one person as if he played in a vacuum.
:sidelol: you're getting smoked in here ilovemyfins quit while you still have some dignity
its not his fault, get him a stout o line, a top defense, a calvin johnson type wr, and a antonio gates type tightend for the red zone and he will be successful. i guarantee u.
Actually Jake Grove and Justin Smiley had their career years. We also had Fasano who was a huge help and 2 vet RBs that could pick up a blitz.
QBs can make OLs look better than they actually are. Your OL was not bad the 2nd half of last year, Ryan wasn't touched in week 17 against us and he still was terrible.
the '08 line was probably better than this one but they weren't the old hogs either. Ryan has more talent around him than Chad did. The sched was easier and there wasn't Brady to deal with but they took care of business which Miami could not do a year ago against mediocre/bad teams to end the year and they haven't been able to do it against good teams to end 2014.
---------- Post added at 04:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------
2008 certainly wasn't all Chad just like your failures now are not all Ryan but Chad had a track record in this league. any healthy season where he played at least 3 qtrs. of a season he led his team to the playoffs. Ryan has no track record to fal back on.
Yep. We were better down the stretch vs bad teams in 2008 than we were in 2013. Again, that goes back to the previous contention. You're putting that all on one person as if he played in a vacuum.
In terms of time to make decisions yes. Chad was very smart with the football. Tannehill has come a long way with his decisions. Not to that level yet but he's young.does any of that have to do w/ the QB making good decisions?
its just amusing ppl discrediting pennington for 2008 bc of a ''soft'' sched, yet when tannehill had a chance vs 2 below avg teams last year