I agree that is what makes football king. I love it when they are playing in the slop and snow.
I think the superbowl should make it around to all the teams in the league not just the warm/dome teams. The press is a big reason they dont play the superbowl in crappy weather locations. That was all the bitchin about detroit a couple years ago aww its cold outside blah blah blah.
No, people complained because Detroit is not a fun place.
The Super Bowl isn't just a game. It's a week-long event. Celebrities, parties, etc, etc. It's a big thing. And you need a place that can support it. Jacksonville had no business having the game and neither did Detroit. People were bored out of their skulls in Jax. Detroit, lets face it, is not the brightest of places.
Do you think the game should ever be in Buffalo or Green Bay??
IMO, we should have a steady rotation of Miami, Atlanta, San Diego, Tampa and New York. Perhaps Dallas or Houston. You have to have a team to get the game. So Los Angeles is out until they get one.
As for the retractable roof, if it means no rain during the Super Bowl, I'm all for it.
Heck, when it pours down rain, the Phins games are largely empty. We had a friggin monsoon during the Ravens game in 2000. As a result, only a handful of people got to see Dan's number being retired at halftime (national TV game). It poured during the Jets MNF game on Christmas. And nobody saw Richmond Webb go into the Ring of Honor.
And many times you end up getting sick thereafter. I'd say I've gotten sick 50 percent of the games I went to where it poured. Dog sick for a week after Dan's game.
I'll go regardless. But I'll be honest, if there's a roof during bad rains, I'm much more enthused about going. And I'll bet there's a lot more people in the stands.