claytonduper
Starter
- Joined
- May 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,540
- Reaction score
- 3,616
Well, Dave Wanstadt implied there is nothing wrong with a 3 and out series and punting the ball. It almost worked.
Yep -- if you're gonna make FOUR changes on the offensive line, you better be doing it with top-notch talent and an O coordinator who's not learning the playbook as he teaches it to the four new guys.phunwin said:I'll surely be flamed for this, but I think that's right; the gameplan itself was not a bad one. The lack of intensity, effort and execution on the OL speaks badly to the coaching staff, but the gameplan was pretty good.
phunwin said:I'll surely be flamed for this, but I think that's right; the gameplan itself was not a bad one. The lack of intensity, effort and execution on the OL speaks badly to the coaching staff, but the gameplan was pretty good.
It was a great gameplan - He was playing to our strength (Which is our D). It's a boring gameplan IMO, but it was working. Until our offense gave up points....phunwin said:I'll surely be flamed for this, but I think that's right; the gameplan itself was not a bad one. The lack of intensity, effort and execution on the OL speaks badly to the coaching staff, but the gameplan was pretty good.
fins4o8 said:yeah the gameplan was great. Turk almost tied a MIA record for the most punts in a game. way to go Wanny!
why did we run the ball with 6 mins left in the game? i dont understand why we even ran the ball during the 2nd half. watching the game was so predictable. DEF stacking the line against us & blitzing during long passing downs. how many deep pass plays did we have?
HUH? That's not the gameplans fault... That's execution.... You can't put all the blame on Wanny for that.Grumpy said:Great gameplan, 22 yards on 19 attempts from your starting RB. Feeley throwing balls into the dirt.