Suck for MARIOTA | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Suck for MARIOTA

Marino1313

Marino1313

Scout Team
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
4,483
Reaction score
3,402
Location
Toronto
Who is with me?

I was a big Tannehill supporter. This is my final straw. He has regressed big time! He needs to go asap!
 
Ah.. if only we had just sucked the year Luck came out. All those people saying they wouldnt do it have little idea how investments work. I couldnt believe that there were actually people on here arguing against tanking.

Dolphins need to tank until they find an elite QB. I would rather be really bad and wait on a QB than this mediocre crap. Tank for Mariota.. if he sucks, tank again and get the #1 QB the year after.. Keep repeating. Yes, its possible to win without a QB but we obviously dont have the coaching staff to motivate players or come up with well designed schemes. So the only way Dolphins will do anything is with an elite QB. Getting 6-8 wins has been crippling this franchise.

Tannehill might get good enough to get into the playoffs but I dont think he will be good enough to carry a team - and I'm a huge supporter of his.
 
Ive said this in other threads and I'll keep saying it.

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT PICK WE HAVE....WE WILL **** IT UP.

If we sucked for luck, Ireland would've traded down to draft 2 linemen equivalent to Dallas Thomas.

We traded up into the top 3 and who did we get? Dion Jordan.

So really, who cares where we draft. We are the Dolphins. We will waste the pick.
 
I guess you guys haven't noticed that QBs in this league that prefer to work out of the pocket don't last long. RGIII can't stay healthy, the novelty on Kaepernick is wearing off, Mike Vick worked for a little while like Kaepernick and then was trash...there are too many failed instances of running QBs. Oh, Jake Locker is another guy. Russell Wilson prefers to work in the pocket but he will scramble if you don't contain him...there is a difference.
 
Luck is the only QB in recent memory that was a "cant miss" prospect. All other QBs came with concerns.

When the Panthers picked Newton first overall everyone was doubting them and saying how foolish it was. In my opinion it was the perfect choice. They drafted him on absolute potential. Sure, his chance of busting was really high but you pick him based on that chance of him becoming a top 8 QB.

Take a chance on Mariota or Jamies Winston. If they dont work out, tank again. I'm really not a huge fan of either one but take the freaking chance. We've been without a QB for far too long. Take 2 QBs every year. I dont even give a damn.
 
I am on board for a new QB we won't be bad enough to get this kid though. Time to scout QBs
 
Mariota sucks dude.

Stop bringing up ****ty QBs. Im TIRED OF ****TY QBs ON THE DOLPHINS!!!!!!!

GET A REAL QB!!!!
 
datruth55 said:
I guess you guys haven't noticed that QBs in this league that prefer to work out of the pocket don't last long. RGIII can't stay healthy, the novelty on Kaepernick is wearing off, Mike Vick worked for a little while like Kaepernick and then was trash...there are too many failed instances of running QBs. Oh, Jake Locker is another guy. Russell Wilson prefers to work in the pocket but he will scramble if you don't contain him...there is a difference.
Click to expand...

Honestly, I've only seen highlights of Mariota. Fill in Mariota with whoever you feel has the highest ceiling. I'm talking general principles here not specific players. People ragged on the Bortles pick but the Jags took a chance. If he has a 25% chance of being elite, you draft the guy. Do that enough times and you'll get an elite QB eventually. THEN you can go out and work on the rest of your roster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom