Tannehills regression (really?) A Rodgers the Saint

[Rev Kev]

Both Ryan and Aaron had harsh first halfs on Sunday

4 plays stick out in the 2nd half -> 2 plays each

Wallace is interferred with a perfectly thrown long ball strike in EZ -> the Flag should have come out -> ball on the 1 -> (Perhaps game tied a play later)

Same series -> Wallace falls down making his cut and Dee Miliner undercuts where Wallace has fallen down where he should be and people call out Ryan?

As bad as everyone was on O and D - the game was not out of reach until those two plays cost us dearly

----

A Rogers 2 picks in first half VS Chicago but D holds serve, Rogers throws a pick through defenders hands into Quarless (It was a TERRIBLE READ) and A Rodgers made a handful that he was fortunate to survive

Last minute -> Rodgers ignores wide open Jones down the sidelines and chooses to throw it into the mid field on 3rd down -> ball clangs off D and WR -> 4th down Rodgers hits Cobbs -> game over

Lastly -> Rodgers was erratic throughout the game throwing the ball all over the freakin place and his team was ballin -> the ball was often low, behind them and they flat out got the job done

Tannehill gets half the reliability from his cast -> as other PO teams re: if we are down to one starter


IRELAND -> Must be held as accountable as the coaches when the starters go down and we get little production

 

[Shouright]

We're comparing Ryan Tannehill to Aaron Rodgers on the basis of one game?

 

[flynryan15]

Rodgers might be a bit rusty missing 6 games ya think?

 

[Rev Kev]

We are NOT comparing their careers we are comparing 4 4th quarter plays -> and that is the difference here -> don't putr words in my mouth I just might take you behind the shed

 

[Shouright]

We are NOT comparing their careers we are comparing 4 4th quarter plays -> and that is the difference here -> don't putr words in my mouth I just might take you behind the shed

And you believe you can make a meaningful conclusion about something, anything, on the basis of four plays?

 

[Rev Kev]

Rodgers might be a bit rusty missing 6 games ya think?

I am a Large Rodgers fan -> but these two games came down to a few key plays in the 4th -> Tannehill could have easily been the Saint and Rodgers the Goat is all I am saying -> don't throw Ryans' progress out the window over 2 games.

And yes I expected more from Aaron considering he was practicing the last month without contact, this wasn't his first rodeo

 

[WVDolphan]

And you believe you can make a meaningful conclusion about something, anything, on the basis of four plays?

Well, I know Ryan Tannehill wouldve been sacked on that game winning play where Rodgers made a great move to avoid the rush, spin away, and make a great throw down the field for a TD with less than a minute left.

Even if Tannehill wouldve gotten away from the rush, which we all know he wouldnt have, he wouldve missed the throw if he even attempted it. Cobb was too wide open down the field for Tannehill to connect. It wouldve been Cobb's fault though for not going full Megatron.

 

[finsfanjay13]

Well, I know Ryan Tannehill wouldve been sacked on that game winning play where Rodgers made a great move to avoid the rush, spin away, and make a great throw down the field for a TD with less than a minute left.

Even if Tannehill wouldve gotten away from the rush, which we all know he wouldnt have, he wouldve missed the throw if he even attempted it. Cobb was too wide open down the field for Tannehill to connect. It wouldve been Cobb's fault though for not going full Megatron.

I do not think that word means what you think it means...

 

[Rev Kev]

And you believe you can make a meaningful conclusion about something, anything, on the basis of four plays?

I am not trying to bring you "anything"

I am expressing "opinion" just like your horse_____ (insert word)

Let me dumb it down for you..., One is a hero one is a goat -> 4 plays in the 4th Quarter -> Tannehill put the ball in the right place and is a goat / Aaron was fortunate to get a 4th Down and he was money

You are welcome to leave and create a spread sheet for us

 

[Shouright]

I am not trying to bring you "anything"

I am expressing "opinion" just like your horse_____ (insert word)

Let me dumb it down for you..., One is a hero one is a goat -> 4 plays in the 4th Quarter -> Tannehill put the ball in the right place and is a goat / Aaron was fortunate to get a 4th Down and he was money

You are welcome to leave and create a spread sheet for us

Are you aware that Rodgers's QB rating was 85.2 to Tannehill's 42.1, and his net YPA was 8.2 (which is exceptionally good) to Tannehill's 5.1?

In other words, when you get beyond your four plays, you see that one QB played well enough for his team to be competitive all day and ultimately win the game, whereas the other did not.

 

[Rev Kev]

Are you aware that Rodgers's QB rating was 85.2 to Tannehill's 42.1, and his net YPA was 8.2 (which is exceptionally good) to Tannehill's 5.1?

In other words, when you get beyond your four plays, you see that one QB played well enough for his team to be competitive all day and ultimately win the game, whereas the other did not.

Well maybe you could create a spead sheet for me because i no comprendo -> I think I ALREADY stated that GB was balling in the cold -> I watched the CHI/GB game unlike you, the passes were erratic, catches fantastic, and CHI's tackling horrendous -> I guess that is also in your precious QBR rating, eh?

 

[Shouright]

Well maybe you could create a spead sheet for me because i no comprendo -> I think I ALREADY stated that GB was balling in the cold -> I watched the CHI/GB game unlike you, the passes were erratic, catches fantastic, and CHI's tackling horrendous -> I guess that is also in your precious QBR rating, eh?

And that includes Rodgers, or not?

If it does, then we can agree, and I'll stand by my statement that he played much better than Tannehill yesterday.

 

[Canadianfishfan]

Well maybe you could create a spead sheet for me because i no comprendo -> I think I ALREADY stated that GB was balling in the cold -> I watched the CHI/GB game unlike you, the passes were erratic, catches fantastic, and CHI's tackling horrendous -> I guess that is also in your precious QBR rating, eh?

I'm sorry. **** stats.

It's all about wins.

Rodgers won. Tannehill did not.

End of story.

All you're trying to do is make yourself feel better about losing.

There is no silver lining. Tannehill didn't lead his team to the playoffs.

 

[jvw]

To be honest, RT had more than 4 plays to get his team to the playoffs, he had two games and scored a total of 7 points...that's not going to get it done....

 

[dabeastdabone]

I thought it was questionable how the Packers advanced a fumble, flung forward by Rodgers hand, for a touchdown. Seems that translates a bit different then the play we had vs. the Patriots.