Green Phin
Starter
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 434
- Reaction score
- 1
I was reading an article of Peter King on coach Bill Walsh and he quotes a foreword Walsh wrote for book that King wrote. "Owners wanted someone who'd yell and scream and whip their players into submission, but I don't believe that's how to coach. I think you have to treat players intelligently. Sometimes you have to threaten players, and discipline them, and yell at them. But my approach is to teach, because players need to be prepared mentally to play the sophisticated football of the nineties."
The controversy between yelling coaches (aka disciplinarians) and teaching coaches (aka player coaches) is still on today, as we can see in a difference of styles between our previous coach (Manny Wright incident) and our current one. When I played sports I always preferred someone who explained to me why we were doing this or that than someone who just ordered me to do something.
So here goes my question. Since both styles have proven they can win, which one you prefer?
The controversy between yelling coaches (aka disciplinarians) and teaching coaches (aka player coaches) is still on today, as we can see in a difference of styles between our previous coach (Manny Wright incident) and our current one. When I played sports I always preferred someone who explained to me why we were doing this or that than someone who just ordered me to do something.
So here goes my question. Since both styles have proven they can win, which one you prefer?