Team Rankings WR
- Thread starter MDFINFAN
- Start date
Lappy
Speedwagon:3 am Crew!
I was a little shocked with the order putting the Seahawks at 9. I don't see it but I could be wrong.
I agreed with 1-4 then I thought it's a any teams game after that.
I agreed with 1-4 then I thought it's a any teams game after that.
That's sounds alright. what's garbage though is that the Lions, and the vikings have better QB situations than us.http://msn.foxsports.com/fantasy/story/5633056
Man who do they have doing their research.:shakeno:
Man who do they have doing their research.:shakeno:
Alex44
Chicago Bears GM
I definitly disagree with most of it
Mostly
San Diego, New Orleans, and the Jags
Mostly
San Diego, New Orleans, and the Jags
ckparrothead
Premium Member
Matt Jones is going to be incredible as a starter. That's my prediction. Deep ball. All day. That's all I'd be throwin him.
campeonaso
Seasoned Veteran
how can the chargers be ahead of us ,this is bul ...
FinsAreLife
F-A-L
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
- Messages
- 4,747
- Reaction score
- 0
disagree, although im not completely surprised
we should be placed around 8-10.
Chambers hands down is now one of the best receivers in the league, booker showed much improvement in our system at the end of next year and is very reliable, welker is a great 3rd option in sticky situations and cambell just works well with culpepper and has been said to be working hard and then our rookie looks to have much upside.
we should be placed around 8-10.
Chambers hands down is now one of the best receivers in the league, booker showed much improvement in our system at the end of next year and is very reliable, welker is a great 3rd option in sticky situations and cambell just works well with culpepper and has been said to be working hard and then our rookie looks to have much upside.
killakimo
Starter
- Joined
- May 4, 2006
- Messages
- 300
- Reaction score
- 0
i think we should be a little higher, but that's alright. less focus/pressure on our receivers. my question is, how the heck is jacksonville rated higher than seattle, carolina and denver??? shoot, i think we have better receivers than they (jags) do. waddevah. those ANALists ain't $hit.
trate121hb
Go Heat!
i would rank them right around 15......
feelthepain
☠️ Banned ☠️
I agree,it looks right to me. Till our WO's prove something we are what we are. I think having a franchise QB will elevate the talent level at WO for us. Good link, thanks.
Dolphan23
Pro Bowler
Alex22 said:
oh yeah absolutely....they put those rankings together in their sleep or something...there's no way we should be 15....and the giants are 19th? that doesnt make sense either....whaaatever....
Canadi-Phin
I hate everyone else in the AFC East
I disagree, we are too low. Plus I'd rather have Chad Johnson and TJ over Harrison and Wayne.
uga3406
Pro Bowler
i love the wr corps this year. With the breakout year chambers had lats year and the fact we have hagana and devin ash. from auburn and lets not forget booker or campbell, to go alon with culpepper ,this could be a exciting offense to watch.