Teams we could trade Tyreek to? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Teams we could trade Tyreek to?

V

VAFinsfan72

Club Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Messages
4,371
Reaction score
8,538
Age
52
Location
Virginia
I think the Packers would be a perfect destination for Tyreek. He will love it in Green Bay.

They have over $62M in cap space in 2025 so they can afford him.

Christian Watson suffered a torn ACL yesterday so he could miss all or most of next year.

They really don't have a number 1 WR, they have a few 2's and 3's, Reed, Doubs and Wicks.

His dead cap hit if we trade him pre June 1 would be $28.3M with about $600K in cap savings.

His cap number if he is on the team in 2025 is about $27.7M.

He has no more guaranteed money remaining on his contract after 2025.

Lets say we could get a 2nd in 2025 and a 3rd in 2026.
 
How bout NE? Give Drake Maye a real weapon. They have the space to take on his contract
 
1000014541.jpg

1000014540.jpg


I could see Washington doing it. They could use the headline and they have been known to make the splashy offseason move in the past.

I don't agree with the bookies that Harbough and the Chargers would do this, I think he's too smart to bring in an aging diva WR.

Steelers already have an issue with Pickens turning into a Diva (in record time i may say) they had to deal with AB too, i doubt very much Tolmin wants another loud mouth like this.

Riaders kinda make sense... they moved to a new stadium and they love their Billboard names in Vegas. It makes alot of sense, they need to sell tickets, Hill is still a draw, the Raiders love "fast" players historically speaking. I also bet Hill would love moving there and playing against KC twice a season.... i think the Raiders are too low on this list as I'm thinking about it, writing this.

Atlanta doesn't have a ton of cap space, they are going with a Rookie QB in Penix, i doubt they want Hill poisoning that lockerroom.

Packers makes sense.... maybe we could get a WR in return, they have like a half-dozen decent ones.

Broncos is a no way IMO, Sean Peyton isn't a dummy, he will stay away from Tyreek like a vegan at a BBQ contest.

KC is also a, no way. Andy Reid and Mahomes don't want him back, he was toxic on the way out of KC, Tyreek burned that bridge.

The market historically speaking; for an outspoken PR nightmare of a diva WR like Tyreek, who's over 30, is usually pretty weak. i doubt many teams are interested. Just thinking back to guys like Dez Bryant, TO. Ocho, AB... i think Hill's in this group now. So be prepared to only get back a 3rd or 4th.

If I had to bet, I'd say the Riaders make the most sense followed by Washington.
 
Those odds suggest he really could be traded. Even though the Dolphins are the most likely team he will be on on opening day, there is still only about a 1 in 6 chance of it.
 
The Raiders make a lot of sense. They have over $107M in cap space next year. They are a dysfunctional franchise much like the Dolphins so they might actually trade for him especially knowing he will be motivated to play against the Chiefs twice a year so they might be willing to pay a decent price in a trade that most other teams wouldn't.

I just liked the idea of the Packers as a punishment to Tyreek, sending him to Green Bay and its an NFC team. He would like going to Las Vegas but if they give us enough compensation then go ahead and do it.
 
VAFinsfan72 said:
I think the Packers would be a perfect destination for Tyreek. He will love it in Green Bay.

They have over $62M in cap space in 2025 so they can afford him.

Christian Watson suffered a torn ACL yesterday so he could miss all or most of next year.

They really don't have a number 1 WR, they have a few 2's and 3's, Reed, Doubs and Wicks.

His dead cap hit if we trade him pre June 1 would be $28.3M with about $600K in cap savings.

His cap number if he is on the team in 2025 is about $27.7M.

He has no more guaranteed money remaining on his contract after 2025.

Lets say we could get a 2nd in 2025 and a 3rd in 2026.
Click to expand...

Packers are notorious for not making big splashy trades and/ or big free agent signings. But they did with Josh jacobs so maybe.
 
Blake the great said:
Packers are notorious for not making big splashy trades and/ or big free agent signings. But they did with Josh jacobs so maybe.
Click to expand...
Yeah they are too well run of a franchise for a move like this.

The Raiders make sense since they are dysfunctional like the Dolphins and would like to make a splash bringing Tyreek to Las Vegas and he gets to play the Chiefs twice a year.
 
Someone with a ton of cap space or someone wanting to help out their young QB.

Washington, Raiders, Panthers maybe even someone like Titans or Giants when they draft a new QB.

His contract isn’t huge for a team that trades for him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom