Your post is a perfect example of why Tommy George told me that he wished every sports bettor would watch every game every week. He was the sportsbook manager of the Horseshoe when I was one of the sportsbook supervisors. Tommy wanted nothing but opinions. Don't hold onto anything foundational, anything big picture. Watch every game and change your mind week to week. I call it the Bar Stool approach.
The bye weeks are supposed to be meaningful. Kudos to the NFL for finding and maintaining this playoff format. Talent level is so balanced in this league that the main thing that causes separation and unexpected outcomes is a situational factor that favors one team or the other.
There has been talk of college football expanding to an 8 team playoff. That would be disgraceful. It would reward teams that finish with 3 losses, creating opportunity for them to sneak in. And it would provide no incentive whatsoever for unbeaten teams. What was Alabama supposed to play for against Georgia in the SEC title game, if 8 teams are included in the playoff? There is zero risk they would fall outside the top 8 even if they lost by 100.
However, make it a 6 team playoff and now it gets interesting. The top two teams would receive byes, identical to the NFL version. Alabama and Clemson still have motivation in those conference title games. Big edge to have that extra week off instead of being forced to play 3 weeks in a row against elite opponents. Supposedly some of the committee members have recommended going to 6 teams. It would almost guarantee that every 1 loss team would make it in, like snubbed Ohio State this season.
I was rooting for Baltimore last week. At least they had an outstanding trait, that physical defense that has given Brady so much trouble in the past. The Ravens were the only team that allowed less than 60% completion percentage this year. They tied for the league lead with 6.3 YPA allowed. San Diego was rather ordinary at 7.1 allowed. That brute Baltimore defense was good enough to defeat the Chargers on the road and came within a whisker of defeating the Chiefs on the road. Granted, Lamar Jackson could have looked terrible but at least there was plenty of contrast. The Patriots have not faced him. Game would have unfolded totally differently, with every possession being critical and potential for big plays to decide matters.
I'm still a big believer in contrast, because so often decades ago the Cream teams were frustrated by contrast but nothing else. The mirror image teams would succumb since they simply were a cut below in every category. Rivers to Brady is like that.