The Dolphins Were 94% Likely To Win... | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The Dolphins Were 94% Likely To Win...

Well tannehill is 0 for against the pats in his career therefore since he's won 0% of the games against the pats we had exactly 0% chance of winning the game. This kinda sucks because we will have a 0% chance of beating the pats in our next game since we've won 0% with tanny as our starter in the past. Here's the good news though. We have won 100% of the time against the bengals with tanny starting for us so we have 100% chance of winning on Thursday. Make sure you all bet your house

God, he's a dolt

---------- Post added at 05:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:24 PM ----------



Wrong. See above post

Your argument above is nonsense because you don't have a large enough sample to be considered statistically meaningful...or don't you get that?
 
Your argument above is nonsense because you don't have a large enough sample to be considered statistically meaningful...or don't you get that?

Oh boy. With that response i can see how you don't get it. Let me try again. X amount of teams make the playoffs when they start 3-0. The broncos and dolphins started 3-0. You think that if we could play 1 million seasons from the 3-0 staring point both the broncos and dolphins would approach x. You assume these games and teams are in a vacuum. I mean listen, if you don't get it I don't know what to tell you. It's simple simple stuff
 
29koz89-2.jpg


RIP Lou Reed
 
It actually goes up and down more sensitively than that, even. The fact that New England got the ball in better field position after the missed field goal was meaningful with regard to the Dolphins' win probability at that point, for example.

However, I disagree that it doesn't mean anything until the game is over. The likelihood a team has of winning the game should inform the decisions it makes during the game. If the game is well in hand, you don't play as though it is not, and if the game is far from in hand, you don't play as though it is.

I dunno. These percentages mean nothing to me. The Dolphins have a 94% chance of winning at that point? Great. Very awesome of them to blow it then.
 
I dunno. These percentages mean nothing to me. The Dolphins have a 94% chance of winning at that point? Great. Very awesome of them to blow it then.
Well I think we agree there, that it definitely sucked. :)
 
Those generic percentages are interesting as long as you understand they don't apply equally to every situation. For example, if Denver as a 27 point home favorite trailed Jacksonville 17-3 in the same scenario you'd have to be an utter fool to believe their win likelihood was only 6%.

Similarly, New England was roughly a 6 point favorite today. And they have an astounding home record. I never felt like a 94% favorite to cash my bet, even though I had +6.5 points, not merely a need to win the game outright.
 
Those generic percentages are interesting as long as you understand they don't apply equally to every situation. For example, if Denver as a 27 point home favorite trailed Jacksonville 17-3 in the same scenario you'd have to be an utter fool to believe their win likelihood was only 6%.

Similarly, New England was roughly a 6 point favorite today. And they have an astounding home record. I never felt like a 94% favorite to cash my bet, even though I had +6.5 points, not merely a need to win the game outright.

Of course. But utter fools abound
 
You should have made this thread during the game, I would have gladly taken 10-1 odds for any amount of money.
 
Closer to 16 to 1

I know, I'm giving him a good price. In fact Shouright, the next time you have NE pegged as a 94% loser I'll give you my phone number and I'll take 10-1 odds for any amount. As a stats guy you should know this to be a bet you can't turn down if you really trust your percentages.
 
I know, I'm giving him a good price. In fact Shouright, the next time you have NE pegged as a 94% loser I'll give you my phone number and I'll take 10-1 odds for any amount. As a stats guy you should know this to be a bet you can't turn down if you really trust your percentages.
I'll take that bet the next 10 times the Patriots are 94% likely to lose in the 2nd half of a game, for $100 apiece. It may take a while to amass 10 games in which the Patriots are 94% likely to lose in the 2nd half of a game, and you may win one or two of the ten, but in the end I'll come out with a lot more money than you do. ;)
 
I'll take that bet the next 10 times the Patriots are 94% likely to lose in the 2nd half of a game, for $100 apiece. It may take a while to amass 10 games in which the Patriots are 94% likely to lose in the 2nd half of a game, and you may win one or two of the ten, but in the end I'll come out with a lot more money than you do. ;)

If we would have started yesterday I would already be up $1000 and free rolling on the rest.
 
Back
Top Bottom