Dr. Phin
Scout Team
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2008
- Messages
- 8,346
- Reaction score
- 66
Well tannehill is 0 for against the pats in his career therefore since he's won 0% of the games against the pats we had exactly 0% chance of winning the game. This kinda sucks because we will have a 0% chance of beating the pats in our next game since we've won 0% with tanny as our starter in the past. Here's the good news though. We have won 100% of the time against the bengals with tanny starting for us so we have 100% chance of winning on Thursday. Make sure you all bet your house
God, he's a dolt
---------- Post added at 05:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:24 PM ----------
Wrong. See above post
Your argument above is nonsense because you don't have a large enough sample to be considered statistically meaningful...or don't you get that?