The Gap between Tannehill and Moore isn't huge | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The Gap between Tannehill and Moore isn't huge

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PutchaFinzUp

☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
It's clear that Tannehill is leagues above Moore in terms of physical talent and upside, however nothing has changed as far as offensive production. There's just something off about him.

The offensive production hasn't taken a dip withTannehill missing, which would indicate that he isn't an IMPACT player. Reminds me of when we played New England ealier this year and Jimmy Garoppolo being on par with Brady, they were feasting, then they got to the 3rd string, and offensive production clearly dipped.

Also during the "winning stretch". Tannehill's stats have been rather pedestrian. And the meldown at Baltimore with 3interceptions, or taking 4 sacks against the Rams, doesn't help.

The offense is doing just as well with Moore. The only difference, is Moore's game is very ugly to watch compared to Tannehill. But so far he's gotten the job done when it truly counts. Infact, I think he'd have done better or just as good against the Ravens.

I'm not saying Moore should be the starter, but I do believe you could find a QB in later rounds, that would be just as good, if not better than Tannehill. Ajaiyi is one we should be thanking tbh.
 
PutchaFinzUp said:
It's clear that Tannehill is leagues above Moore in terms of physical talent and upside, however nothing has changed as far as offensive production. There's just something off about him.

The offensive production hasn't taken a dip withTannehill missing, which would indicate that he isn't an IMPACT player. Reminds me of when we played New England ealier this year and Jimmy Garoppolo being on par with Brady, they were feasting, then they got to the 3rd string, and offensive production clearly dipped.

Also during the "winning stretch". Tannehill's stats have been rather pedestrian. And the meldown at Baltimore with 3interceptions, or taking 4 sacks against the Rams, doesn't help.

The offense is doing just as well with Moore. The only difference, is Moore's game is very ugly to watch compared to Tannehill. But so far he's gotten the job done when it truly counts. Infact, I think he'd have done better or just as good against the Ravens.

I'm not saying Moore should be the starter, but I do believe you could find a QB in later rounds, that would be just as good, if not better than Tannehill. Ajaiyi is one we should be thanking tbh.
Click to expand...

Um yes you are.
 
I will say this bills played their a.. off we luck win that game. moore can handle load. we need be talking about our defense....suck again good running team.
 
Moore was brutal in the first half. He cam on when we needed it but I can't say he's better than 17.
 
Yessir said:
Put your flame suit on. You dare insinuate Tannehill being a replaceable commodity? :lol:
Click to expand...

Tannehill is replaceable... just not with Matt freakin Moore

Give me Rodgers, Brady, and other elites over Tannehill, but never Moore over Tannehill. That's just dumb.
 
I agree w a good bit of your post whether it's agenda driven or not and that is we are a really well-coached team that doesn't run its offense through the right arm of the QB solely. Like say the Saints or Peyton's Colts did for years. So you aren't going to have a big drop off from QB1 to 2 - especially when QB2 is at least a legit player - it's not like we have Cody Kessler or Matt McGloin back there. Tannehill is the better player but you are correct when you suggest the bottom line drop off isn't that much.
 
If we don't run for like 250 yards, we lose this game easily. Moore did nothing yesterday. Missed tackles by Buffalo inflated Moore's stats.
 
PutchaFinzUp said:
It's clear that Tannehill is leagues above Moore in terms of physical talent and upside, however nothing has changed as far as offensive production. There's just something off about him.

The offensive production hasn't taken a dip withTannehill missing, which would indicate that he isn't an IMPACT player. Reminds me of when we played New England ealier this year and Jimmy Garoppolo being on par with Brady, they were feasting, then they got to the 3rd string, and offensive production clearly dipped.

Also during the "winning stretch". Tannehill's stats have been rather pedestrian. And the meldown at Baltimore with 3interceptions, or taking 4 sacks against the Rams, doesn't help.

The offense is doing just as well with Moore. The only difference, is Moore's game is very ugly to watch compared to Tannehill. But so far he's gotten the job done when it truly counts. Infact, I think he'd have done better or just as good against the Ravens.

I'm not saying Moore should be the starter, but I do believe you could find a QB in later rounds, that would be just as good, if not better than Tannehill. Ajaiyi is one we should be thanking tbh.
Click to expand...

sounds kind of like the patriots don't you think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom