This is not a Bill Parcells draft | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

This is not a Bill Parcells draft

DKphin

DKphin

Active Roster
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
14,535
Reaction score
6,353
Location
Pattaya, Thailand
I think Parcells is sitting back at letting his protege take full control of this draft and he is failing miserably. How in the Hell do you take Brian Hartline when Louis Murphy is on the board. I would not have taken a WR, but taking Hartline makes no sense.
 
DKphin said:
I think Parcells is sitting back at letting his protege take full control of this draft and he is failing miserably. How in the Hell do you take Brian Hartline when Louis Murphy is on the board. I would not have taken a WR, but taking Hartline makes no sense.
Click to expand...


Well now we have the market cornered on 4.5 receivers including Pat white.
I told this board that if we did not take Nicks in the first the talent level real fell.
 
On the contrary.

Every person selected in this draft fits Bill's mold.
 
I'm going to wait to pass judgement on the draft. The front office obviously knows things we don't know. Maybe they feel more confident in certain positions than we all do.

Cam's injury. Wilford's practice problem. Soliai's maturity. Wake's possibilities.

It's not a strong draft by any means, so they have some kind of plan going on.
 
Jerry Rice ran slow....Irvin ran slow....give it a break already. They have their reasons.
 
i agree we should of take murphy but hartline us good he is a tall version of wes welker. Trust r Draft now R Offense has Great Firepower... D Coordinators r gonna be scared
 
It's okay to question a team's motives. Brian Hartline really?
 
I think Hartline represents a bigger, faster version of Greg Camarillo. I love GC, but after that knee injury (maybe it's a little worse than originally thought), I see how Hartline makes sense.

Looking at our WR Depth in no particular order:

1. Ginn
2. Bess
3. London
4. Turner
5. Hartline
6. Camarillo
7. Wilford

We all know Wilford is expendable at this point, and I'm not afraid to stick myself in the minority, but I think Camarillo might be as well. I know he got that extension, but if his knee isn't coming along as well as hoped and the front office had a chance to add a bigger, faster version of him - why not?
 
WelcomeBack said:
I'm going to wait to pass judgement on the draft. The front office obviously knows things we don't know. Maybe they feel more confident in certain positions than we all do.

Cam's injury. Wilford's practice problem. Soliai's maturity. Wake's possibilities.

It's not a strong draft by any means, so they have some kind of plan going on.
Click to expand...


I agree with you. This draft is not very strong - it is more of a "depth" draft. More than the picks that we're making, I'm surprised that we aren't trading down more!! There should have been suitors and we could have still taken the players we have.
 
RoninFin4 said:
I think Hartline represents a bigger, faster version of Greg Camarillo. I love GC, but after that knee injury (maybe it's a little worse than originally thought), I see how Hartline makes sense.

Looking at our WR Depth in no particular order:

1. Ginn
2. Bess
3. London
4. Turner
5. Hartline
6. Camarillo
7. Wilford

We all know Wilford is expendable at this point, and I'm not afraid to stick myself in the minority, but I think Camarillo might be as well. I know he got that extension, but if his knee isn't coming along as well as hoped and the front office had a chance to add a bigger, faster version of him - why not?
Click to expand...

Bingo!

Wilford can be replaced with Turner.

Cam...if his injury isn't progressing as well as thought, would not be on the roster opening day...and Hartline provides that insurance and a ST guy.
 
DKphin said:
I think Parcells is sitting back at letting his protege take full control of this draft and he is failing miserably. How in the Hell do you take Brian Hartline when Louis Murphy is on the board. I would not have taken a WR, but taking Hartline makes no sense.
Click to expand...

I agree with players Sidbury,Mourphy and a number of other players available we get mediocre receivers to add to the mediocre receivers we already have
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom