nopony said:I think people, including the writer of the article, MIGHT be missing one important thing.
What if the "lesson" wasn't not to be a Bronco's fan... it was an ethnicity class.
I have no idea if this is what they were saying, but if it was a lesson about race relations and ostracization, the whole thing makes a lot more sense.
I don't know if this is the case, but it seems a lot more plausible than the way the story puts it.
And I have had enough experience with the media to easily believe they got the whole thing backwards.
This seems more plausible:
"Alright, class, we're talking about race relations in the fifties... who can give me an example?"
"It's like Jimmy wearing a Broncos jersey in Pittsburgh!"
"Very good. How would we treat Jimmy if we were racially intolerant in the 50's?"
"We'd make him sit in the back of the bus or the floor!"
etc...
No idea if this is what happened, but it seems the most likely answer to me.
Basileus777 said:I see what you are saying, and the media certainly does like to spin things. But wasn't this during an actual test? And once it was clear that the Student was embarrassed why continue if the point is to teach?
finfansince72 said:They said he was wearing #7 for Elway, if he was wearing a #16 this action would have been warranted.
HysterikiLL said:WTF? If he was wearing a different players jersey, the 'action would have been warranted'? That's just wrong man. Nobody should have to be subjected to that under any circumstances when they are expressing their beliefs/opinions unobtrusively in a learning environment.
nopony said:I think people, including the writer of the article, MIGHT be missing one important thing.
What if the "lesson" wasn't not to be a Bronco's fan... it was an ethnicity class.
I have no idea if this is what they were saying, but if it was a lesson about race relations and ostracization, the whole thing makes a lot more sense.
I don't know if this is the case, but it seems a lot more plausible than the way the story puts it.
And I have had enough experience with the media to easily believe they got the whole thing backwards.
This seems more plausible:
"Alright, class, we're talking about race relations in the fifties... who can give me an example?"
"It's like Jimmy wearing a Broncos jersey in Pittsburgh!"
"Very good. How would we treat Jimmy if we were racially intolerant in the 50's?"
"We'd make him sit in the back of the bus or the floor!"
etc...
No idea if this is what happened, but it seems the most likely answer to me.
HysterikiLL said:WTF? If he was wearing a different players jersey, the 'action would have been warranted'? That's just wrong man. Nobody should have to be subjected to that under any circumstances when they are expressing their beliefs/opinions unobtrusively in a learning environment.