^^^That is not you. You base your arguments on opinions, not facts. When you are presented with facts; whether it be video or written form, you say that it only tells part of the story. That your eyes are more reliable than any evidence that could be presented. Again, the Mario Manningham catch is still the best evidence of that. Your unwillingness to see the other side of the argument even though there is clear video evidence and EVERY expert said it was a catch during and after the fact.
No. If you were as objective as you say you were people wouldn't argue with you. They would be able to see your side of the argument because they would know that you are reasonable person willing to admit when someone else has a valid point. Problem is You NEVER concede to anyone else's point. You always have to be right. Hence your issue with needing have the last word (and the ability to derail threads on a regular basis.)
As for finding your old posts? No thanks. Vaark does a spectacular job of drudging up enough of your follies.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objective