That statement backfired didn't it?The Bills have looked horrendous in so many losses this year, but are still in contention because they can run the ball and force turnovers. And luck today. They could very well be the final seed in the playoffs, but their game at New England probably ends their season. If New England was running away with the AFC, they might go into a shell and let Buffalo compete, but I think they will still be close enough to Pittsburgh that they will come out with all hands on deck. But if I’m Buffalo, I’m not mailing it in just yet. I think they hammer Miami next week. Just looks like a bad matchup with us coming off a loss to NE and Buffalo still having something to play for.
Didn't watch it. I was watching the Fins and they put me to sleep. What happened?And the Pats get yet another call. If that was a Pat receiver, that call isn't reversed, zero doubt about that.
Does the NFL think people like this? Because the ratings aren't supporting that.
Go for the knees, Buffalo.
And the Pats get yet another call. If that was a Pat receiver, that call isn't reversed, zero doubt about that.
Does the NFL think people like this? Because the ratings aren't supporting that.
Go for the knees, Buffalo.
Didn't watch it. I was watching the Fins and they put me to sleep. What happened?
Most certainly not enough evidence to overturn it. If it was Cooks, would it have been overturned? Precedent says no.Just saw the video.
Looks to me like he didn't have possession of the ball when the foot was dragging, when he did gain possession he didn't have both feet down.
Can't disagree with that.Most certainly not enough evidence to overturn it. If it was Cooks, would it have been overturned? Precedent says no.