Trade with Washington? | Page 5 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Trade with Washington?

Ok, time to go home now Bill fans, your job is done here.

Defended the great Bills tradition well.
 
Any smart sports fan would take Roy Williams, Michael Clayton, or larry fitzgerald over Lee Evans so at best you can put him at 4th up and coming young reciever
 
MCMike81 said:
Any smart sports fan would take Roy Williams, Michael Clayton, or larry fitzgerald over Lee Evans so at best you can put him at 4th up and coming young reciever
Click to expand...

Geesh, the flock flew away and now you have gone and fed the birds....

Time for me to leave the feeder...

:tongue:
 
1. Clements is not faster than Surtain
2. Surtain is a better cover corner
3. Top 10 CB's are too valuable to be returning punts and the redskins have return specialists so don't even bring that argument up.
4. Clements has a brighter future but that's only because he is younger
5. Qoute Me: Wherever Surtain is next year, he will have a better year than Clements
6. The numbers are in favour of Surtain
7. Clements is a little better in run support, that is only one thing

The overall winner of this argument is Surtain.

To whoever said Evans is a top 3 up and coming receiver....
Anquan Boldin
Larry Fitzgerald
Nate Burleson
Roy Williams
Andre Johnson

and there is more.
 
MCMike81 said:
Any smart sports fan would take Roy Williams, Michael Clayton, or larry fitzgerald over Lee Evans so at best you can put him at 4th up and coming young reciever
Click to expand...

If the criteria is "young recievers" then you have to include players with 2 years or less experience so you can add Boldin and Burleson to that list as well...
 
Clements is ok..but he couldn't hold Surtain's jock.
 
Dolfan2788 said:
1. Clements is not faster than Surtain
4.
Click to expand...

clements would absolutely demolish surtain in a foot race. Why do u think clements was in the fastest man competition at the pro bowl.
 
MCMike81 said:
Any smart sports fan would take Roy Williams, Michael Clayton, or larry fitzgerald over Lee Evans so at best you can put him at 4th up and coming young reciever
Click to expand...

Why cuz lee evans is not on your team? BTW he is alreday leaps and bounds better than chambers!
 
Because Surtain was not able to be there and Clements took his place.....

Surtain was picked ahead of Clements for the pro bowl also. Clements just seems faster because he returns punts, you never see Surtain's speed because he plays corner and only corner.
 
miami mayham said:
I heard that Washington wanted to trade their 9th pick overall for a cornerback, they where talking to Buffalo but why would they want Clemente when they could have Surtain? That way we would have the 2 and 9 pick to play with? and anyways has anybody else heard of this deal?
Click to expand...
Because they know Surtain will be traded to KC soon.
 
zevo said:
Why cuz lee evans is not on your team? BTW he is alreday leaps and bounds better than chambers!
Click to expand...

1.Evans in his first year had the same amount of receptions as Chambers did in his first year.
2. Evans was and early first round pick, Chambers was a late 2nd rounder
3. Chambers had more yards than Evans in his first year
4. Evans had only 2 more TD's than Chambers BUT Chambers only started 7 games whereas Evans started 11.
5. Drew Bledsoe maybe only mediocre but compared to the play of Fiedler and Feeley over the last few years he looks like God.
6. Oh yeah and does Evans take on #1 corners like Chambers has to game in game out.... I didn't think so
7. Evans also has Moulds to always take double teams
8. Evans also had a strong running game and defense
 
zevo said:
Why cuz lee evans is not on your team? BTW he is alreday leaps and bounds better than chambers!
Click to expand...

Has Lee or is Lee the #1 reciever on the Bills? Do teams #1 corner cover Lee?

I honestly don't know the answer. But, please educate me.

Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom