Trading deadline in 10 days?? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Trading deadline in 10 days??

tcdrover

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
5,873
Reaction score
642
Remember what happened to #84?

I'm just saying, if teddy doesn't see the field a lot on Monday....:ponder:
 
i doubt we trade Ginn right now maybe at the end of the season but not right now unless we get a better WR in return
 
I don't expect them to trade him either, but if we start to see him sitting on the bench more, it could be a bad sign for the ginn family.
 
If Miami trades Ginn, it had better be for nothing less than a 2nd round pick. Don't waste your time on Bowe or anyone else right now. Give Ginn more time. Get off his back. Let him run. He was a first round pick. He's fast. He hasn't been able to do his thing in Miami yet. Stop perpetuating the "trade Ginn" "Ginn sucks" trend.


Do you remember playing sports as kids?

When teams are picked by captains, player by player?

The clock has been ticking for a while now on Ginn. At some point they have to decide if they really need the contribution that he consistantly makes on the field to win games.

Last week's game was our biggest and only win this year, and other than that reverse his contribution was minimal.
 
If Miami trades Ginn, it had better be for nothing less than a 2nd round pick. Don't waste your time on Bowe or anyone else right now. Give Ginn more time. Get off his back. Let him run. He was a first round pick. He's fast. He hasn't been able to do his thing in Miami yet. Stop perpetuating the "trade Ginn" "Ginn sucks" trend.
that's the problem, he shouldn't have been.
 
its a bad idea to trade ginn. He has talent and if he goes to another team, he will light us up just like all the other players we trade away. If we can get a number one receiver to complement ginn, he will be much more productive. So i say we hold on to him for a little while longer.
 
its a bad idea to trade ginn. He has talent and if he goes to another team, he will light us up just like all the other players we trade away. If we can get a number one receiver to complement ginn, he will be much more productive. So i say we hold on to him for a little while longer.

So you are saying that you are against making the Dolphins better as a team . Just so some other team won't get Ginn on the off chance he actually may do something against us someday.

Hell I would pack his bags for him if it meant we got someone who was more of a playmaker!!!!!
 
So you are saying that you are against making the Dolphins better as a team . Just so some other team won't get Ginn on the off chance he actually may do something against us someday.

Hell I would pack his bags for him if it meant we got someone who was more of a playmaker!!!!!

Well first off.. read the entire post. I said that we should hold on to him for a little while longer in hopes of getting a true number one so he can flourish as a number 2. Dont put words in my mouth.
 
Remember what happened to #84?

I'm just saying, if teddy doesn't see the field a lot on Monday....:ponder:


Come on man...what the hell are we gunna get for the piece of crap. I'm serious...:crazy: if you were managing another team would you want him on your team. Big PUSS!!
 
Come on man...what the hell are we gunna get for the piece of crap. I'm serious...:crazy: if you were managing another team would you want him on your team. Big PUSS!!

You know how the saying goes...

One man's garbage is another man's treasure. Just look at what the Brown's got for young Braying Edwards. ;)

He has got to be at least as big a PUSS as the family guy, and he doesn't have world class speed, or a tape full of incredible college highlight returns and reverses. I think either of our rookie corners can deal with that mommas boy.
 
The only reciever worth trading for is Jackson.. Give SD Ginn and a 1st
 
SD is in contention, you are ignorant for even thinking they would trade him. Think bout it, franchise QB, franchise WR, great RB duo when healthy, decent defense and lines, top TE, and they are going to trade one of their top young studs?!?! come on man, they aint rebuilding, they have a 1st-7th with only a couple of needs. :facepalm: KC on the other hand is rebuilding, bowe is avalible, CLE is rebuilding, BE was traded, DET was rebuilding, Roy Williams gone. Thats like asking ARI to trade Boldin and Fitz or for NE to trade a younger Moss or HOUSTON to trade AJ. come on.
 
SD is in contention, you are ignorant for even thinking they would trade him. Think bout it, franchise QB, franchise WR, great RB duo when healthy, decent defense and lines, top TE, and they are going to trade one of their top young studs?!?! come on man, they aint rebuilding, they have a 1st-7th with only a couple of needs. :facepalm: KC on the other hand is rebuilding, bowe is avalible, CLE is rebuilding, BE was traded, DET was rebuilding, Roy Williams gone. Thats like asking ARI to trade Boldin and Fitz or for NE to trade a younger Moss or HOUSTON to trade AJ. come on.

Both payers not worht trading for.. Boldin would obviously cost more than Jackson.. You are ignorant for even considering Edwards/williams are anywhere near the reciver Jackson, Boldin are anyway.. Bowe, he isnt on the same level as Jackson either. Bowe for a 2nd is a good trade.. Although as I said, Jackson for Ginn and a 1st is a better trade
 
Do you remember playing sports as kids?

When teams are picked by captains, player by player?

The clock has been ticking for a while now on Ginn. At some point they have to decide if they really need the contribution that he consistantly makes on the field to win games.

Last week's game was our biggest and only win this year, and other than that reverse his contribution was minimal.
i fail to see your analogy with ginn and picking captains when i was a kid
 
Back
Top Bottom