dolphinlifer
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 407
- Reaction score
- 115
It seems every year we do the same thing over and over, "oh we need this guy, lets trade this high draft pick for him", then next year or 2 years later its "we don't need this guy anymore, we need this other guy." We always end up giving away high draft picks and then getting rid of them year after year keeping us low on draft picks and with rotating holes to fill.
Before it was stills because mike actually took a stand against that giant derp philbin, now we have stills, young and very affordable it seems and we are trying to get julius for albert instead of just keeping albert and not paying 3m more a year for a guard in FA, thus likely letting stills go, getting one player for two, am I the only one confused with how this seems to happen year after year and we are always wondering why we constantly have holes to fill and no draft picks?
Before it was stills because mike actually took a stand against that giant derp philbin, now we have stills, young and very affordable it seems and we are trying to get julius for albert instead of just keeping albert and not paying 3m more a year for a guard in FA, thus likely letting stills go, getting one player for two, am I the only one confused with how this seems to happen year after year and we are always wondering why we constantly have holes to fill and no draft picks?