I was getting confused by some of these comments relating to RPO and Tua’s durability. Thanks for clearing that up for those that don’t know that RPO does not equate to QB keepers.
I was getting confused by some of these comments relating to RPO and Tua’s durability. Thanks for clearing that up for those that don’t know that RPO does not equate to QB keepers.
RPO? More like RIP if we run that offense. Am I right?
But seriously guys, we need to get Tua less direct hits, not more.
He’s always been one of my favorites.Robert Crumb is a genius... deeply, deeply twisted, but a genius nonetheless.
Research what RPO means. It’s not QB keepersI agree! RPO with Tua is idiotic; do you want to see Tua not play a full season. I see Tua as a left handed Brees. Keep Tua in the pocket and protected.
True, but it does mean the line is run blocking, no matter the QBs decision. All it takes is a DE to sell out, and guess right, and the QB is exposed.Research what RPO means. It’s not QB keepers
You are mistaken...RPO? More like RIP if we run that offense. Am I right?
But seriously guys, we need to get Tua less direct hits, not more.
There does seem to be a misconception about RPO.Welp this thread just proved who really doesn't know a thing about offensive football.
r/woosh
There does seem to be a misconception about RPO.
I would just add that RPO is not so much an offensive philosophy, as much as just another tool in the arsenal.
It's really just a variation of an audible, or a "check with me". It has a place in an offense, but it isn't something to be used exclusively.
To the next.......one armchair gm said to the next....