Putting on a show in this Alamo Bowl against UCLA. If it wasn't for him I would have shut this game off 30 minutes ago.
We don't need another WR that's under 6' feet tall.
We don't need another WR that's under 6' feet tall.
Lockett = Hilton
You dont want that?
screw that, I dont care what anyone says, that kid is flat out talented and a special teamer. He would be like Landry and contribute immediately. blood lines.
Big WR's can tend to be overvalued.
If Mel Gordon is there at 14, you take him. You could trade down in second and pick up another pick like Hickey did last year and start up your defensive picks. Its deep.
This is so true.
Quality route running and good hands are more important.
Even if guys like Brady, Rogers, or manning have tall Big WRs, which for the most part they don't, you'll never see them reach for the ball. It's the irratic qbs who lack accuracy that NEED big WRs, guys like Dalton, newton, stafford.
I think tannehill is better than that, give him quality Technical WRs he will be just fine.
Now a TE on the other hand who can rip up the seam consistently, now that we could use.
Lockett is a football player. He would be a good return man and a GREAT 4th receiver. Could be used in slot and slide Landry to Hartlie's spot or Lockett outside. We do need a big RZ threat and that should be addressed first. Where is Lockett slated to be drafted?
Wonder how many teams said that about Antonio Brown in the 2010 draft.