Upgrading at TE

utahphinsfan

Puck Fitzburgh
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
8,674
Reaction score
28
Location
SE Salt Lake Valley
My preference is Fleener. Then, cut Hilliard and Mastrud. List Clay as FB and the TE's would be Fasano, Fleener & Yeatman.

Clay and Fleener could line up all over. Fasano could be an inline TE and occasional receiver. Yeatman would essentially be an Extra Tackle.

Imagine Fleener lined up @ H-Back, Clay & Bush out wide, Thomas at Tailback and Gates in the slot? The only catch is who the OC is & how creative the HC is.
 

jim1

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
5,825
Reaction score
297
My preference is Fleener. Then, cut Hilliard and Mastrud. List Clay as FB and the TE's would be Fasano, Fleener & Yeatman.

Clay and Fleener could line up all over. Fasano could be an inline TE and occasional receiver. Yeatman would essentially be an Extra Tackle.

Imagine Fleener lined up @ H-Back, Clay & Bush out wide, Thomas at Tailback and Gates in the slot? The only catch is who the OC is & how creative the HC is.
Given what's out there I might just stick with Clay as the pass catching TE.
 

Kistner10

Starter
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
1,494
Reaction score
4
I like our combination of Fasano and Clay so far. Maybe take a flyer on a guy late, but I don't see TE as a serious need.
 

utahphinsfan

Puck Fitzburgh
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
8,674
Reaction score
28
Location
SE Salt Lake Valley
I hate to cite the Pats as precedence but look at the flexibility that Hernandez & Gronkowski give their offense.

Fleener > Graham

2 guys IMO worth a late round flyer... Linthicum (Mich St) & Koger (Michigan)
 
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Top Bottom