Vegas odds. What's going on here

Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
89
Reaction score
67
Age
61
Location
Colorado
Pro and College teams come into Denver, Boulder, Co. Springs (AFA) and Fort Collins from the flat lands have no trouble with the altitude. High 46 will feel awesome to play in for our Fins, a dream compared to 90 degrees/90% humidity. It will have no effect on the ascending Dolphins. against the descending Broncos. Book the - 3.
 

pjzabo

Club Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
55
Reaction score
91
Location
Westchester, NY
I'm sure the kid has seen snow on Mauna Kea when he visited the big Island. Heck I've seen in it Hawaii and I've only been there once.
 

Attachments

  • 800px-Mauna_Kea_from_the_ocean.jpg
    800px-Mauna_Kea_from_the_ocean.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 3

danstilldaman

Club Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Messages
698
Reaction score
515
I truly think the idea of snow affecting a guy like tua is a huge misconception. From what I've always seen it seems like snow typically slows the game down especially the rush. I honestly think that would be ideal with somebody's skill set such as tua, with his ability to read defenses quickly and his anticipation. I guess my only concern would be the snaps from the center, just kidding I think last week was probably anomaly.
 

Joe Dolfan

Club Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
3,433
Reaction score
3,278
Age
49
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
I'm sure the kid has seen snow on Mauna Kea when he visited the big Island. Heck I've seen in it Hawaii and I've only been there once.
Okay, so you found a place where it snows in Hawaii. You know he's been there, or did you just google snow in Hawaii?
 

LANGER72

Super Duper Club
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
13,481
Reaction score
738
Location
Earth
There will not be snow on the field.
40s is very mild in Denver.
The weather should not be an issue.
 

PASQUALE

Seasoned Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
958
Location
BILLINGS, MONTANA
I will be flying from Billings to Denver on Sunday Morning. I got my ticket in Section 324 Seat 16 at Empower End Zone High. According to The Denver Broncos webpage it will be near 50 with Sunshine at KO. Temps will drop to 44 later in the game with some River Fog hovering by the 4th quarter it will be dark and the lights on. For me, I would go if even if it was snowing and 20F. It's the Dolphins! They don't come my way too often.
 

Joe Dolfan

Club Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
3,433
Reaction score
3,278
Age
49
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
I will be flying from Billings to Denver on Sunday Morning. I got my ticket in Section 324 Seat 16 at Empower End Zone High. According to The Denver Broncos webpage it will be near 50 with Sunshine at KO. Temps will drop to 44 later in the game with some River Fog hovering by the 4th quarter it will be dark and the lights on. For me, I would go if even if it was snowing and 20F. It's the Dolphins! They don't come my way too often.
Have a good time.
 

Gsmack_42

Second String
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
1,709
Reaction score
1,061
I still hope it snows. I think the way Ahmed runs, he'll be good in the snow. His feet remind me a little of Keith Byers on Thanksgiving.
Well he has a few rain games, I don’t remember him having a problem.
 

Virginia99

Scout Team
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
443
Reaction score
171
It's all based on power ratings. They don't change quickly, certainly not nearly as rapidly as public perception.

In fact, this number is actually a bit inflated based on every set of power ratings I've looked at. Most have the Dolphins somewhere in the neighborhood of 4.5 to 5 points above Denver, which would made the spread below a field goal. But the oddsmakers realize that public perception and even wise guy perception is toward a developing gap between these two teams, which is why the number opened slightly higher than power ratings would suggest.

There was late money on Miami yesterday, shoving the number from -1.5 to -2.5. There has been late money on the Dolphins many times this season and it has collected more often than not. Trust me, oddsmakers pay attention to that type of thing exponentially more than anything regarding football fundamentals. There has already been money on the Dolphins in this game, with joints now at -3 -120 or -3.5.

Somebody mentioned lack of running game in this thread, toward explanation of a low spread. You could sit through oddsmaker discussion of 1000 games and never hear anything about a running game. They don't care about technical football at all. It's 4-6 guys sitting around with the same sets of power ratings, and discussing where to open the new numbers, based on those power ratings, the home field adjustment (if any) and where they expect the money to go. The chief oddsmaker listens to everybody and then has final say.

It's too bad the weekly Las Vegas Seven went out of business a few years ago. They had a great article based on an actual oddsmaker session, of NCAA tournament games. That article was also online and included pictures of the session plus the dialog as a game was dissected and the line set. It is the only time I have ever seen the process depicted accurately. It is nothing like the public prefers to believe. Games are finished in 30 to 60 seconds tops. Nothing complicated at all. You'll almost never hear the name of a player or coach. In particular I used to link that article on a Canes site where the user base is nothing but Simplistic Angry Males who refused to believe the lines were based on power ratings. Unfortunately the print edition of Las Vegas Seven ended in 2017 and the online content was removed not much later.

Before I forget, here is the Jeff Sagarin NFL power ratings. He has the Dolphins roughly 4.5 points higher, at 22.00 to Denver at 17.53:


Keep in mind the oddsmakers and professional bettors are swamped. They are dealing with multiple sports and hundreds of games and props. I am not wagering as much as previously but right now I am still mentally exhausted from 25+ Masters wagers. I mention this only because fans on a specialized site like this are fixated on one point spread...Dolphins at Broncos. But the guys hanging the numbers only care about applying the same math-based formula all year long, and relying on the 11/10 advantage to grind a decent house take. That's why it has to be quick and subjectivity free.

Professional bettors likewise will view the game as one among many. If the Dolphins win 30-10 and you tell them Miami -3 was the greatest bet of all time and the stupidest line you've ever seen, they'll smile and recommend you don't do this full time. An upstart team on a 5-game winning streak and now road favorite is just the type of thing situational bettors like to oppose. Many sharp guys will wager on Denver for that reason alone. Some of them won't know who Drew Lock is. I'm not saying I would go that way. But I was in that environment for nearly 25 years. Situational analysis dominates the mindset of that type, just like fandom and technical football dominates on sites like this. They won't see this game as Miami at Denver, with all the related particulars. It will be viewed as a team that was supposed to win 6 games in 2020 and now has 6 already, including 5 in a row. Okay, time for some regression to the mean. If they are wrong they'll apply the same thinking and same wager the next time.

I won't have a wager on this game. Most of my underdog angles involve taking the road team. I would have had Chargers yesterday if that game had ever reached +4. Fortunately it did not. Same with this game. I would have Denver plus the points if the game were at Miami.

BTW, one of the reasons the Chargers line was so low is that they were 2-6. That was a popular angle throughout my years in Las Vegas...bet on NFL road underdogs during the second half of the season if their winning percentage is 25% or lower. It has an excellent history so guys play every one. But obviously you have to be able to stomach some dreadful teams and know you'll get hammered from time to time.
Some good insight here. I always thought the pro betters were so good because they did know every angle - weather, matchups, internal issues.
 

SCOTTY

Starter
Joined
Apr 28, 2006
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
4,335
I also believe most profesional power ratings weigh turnovers down as they introduce alot of noise into predictive models. Turnovers and blocked punts always big candidates to regress to the means. In other words, I believe the 22 Fins rating would be higher than that if so many of their points didnt come off turnovers and low percentage plays... Could be way off here, would really like your input on this.
To me turnovers is too big part of the game to disregard in rankings. Its pretty standard that teams that take away more win more. We currently have the longest streak for take aways at 16. And what are we 11-6 over that stretch. How do you determine what TO should or shouldn't count.
 

K-Rob

Go Fish!
Club Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2003
Messages
945
Reaction score
102
Age
45
Location
Colorado
Living in Colorado Springs, I’ve been to nearly all Fins visits to Denver in the last 20 years. I saw the Fiedler final drive/58yd FG win, I saw the Pennington win, and I saw Tannehill nearly pull one out as well against Manning. The altitude is real but these guys are world-class athletes and can find ways to manage just fine.

I’m bummed I’ll be skipping this game but I’m not worried about it.
 
Top Bottom