Very Hypothetical. If Chiefs wanted Hill back what would it cost them?

[dolpns13]

Purely for fun the Chiefs before tonight are 5-2, they’d probably be undefeated if they had Hill, home playoffs throughout. If they wanted him back would it cost them? Given without Hill it would still be low picks. I’d think their first and second rounders for the next 4 years to start. Am I crazy given he’s still tearing it up?

 

[mekadave]

No backsies!

 

[Dark Matter]

All the picks we gave them, plus 1st and 2nd round in 2024 then throw in Travis Kelce.

 

[AquaHawk]

Cannot trade further out than next three drafts. Plus, even if the draft capital was ridiculous, they have to absorb his new contract.

 

[LargoFin]

I am not trading Tyreek for any offer.

 

[Michael Scott]

If the Chiefs called Grier to inquire about Tyreek, I’d imagine nice guy “MacDaniels” transforming into Ethan here:

 

[superphin]

They have to take Ogbah/Hill and give us Kelce/Jones/Humphrey.

 

[DuderinoN703]

Not trading him back. If anything I’d send him to a team whose picks will be Top-10 variety. KC’s picks are always late 20s so pointless.

 

[ForksPhin]

They can’t have him back.

 

[cltchperf]

I'm watching chiefs game and the titans defense has played really well. Tannehill isn't that great, but if he was playing, they probably beat the chiefs in this game. Mahomes just got going but defense has limited mahomes all game even at kc

 

[AdamD13]

Trade deadline passed.

 

[Marino2.0]

Mahomes.

 

[Dark Matter]

A lot of people missing the "very hypothetical" part at the beginning of the thread.

 

[JKS4]

Three 1sts

 

[dol_fan_81]

All draft picks of theirs for the next 10 years + kelce