ChitownPhins28
Basement Dweller
Ahmed is really my sleeper if he can get stronger to stop the injuries he's had, which, I believe involved shoulders.
Or just stupid, which I think Denver was, though it early 2nd-round.I'm with you on that too. I think the only teams that can take a RB in the first are teams who are already deep everywhere else.
My point is, it doesn’t matter who they put back there. They all produce because of their scheme and offensive line play.Not about where they are drafted. That isn't the conversation. SF has been able to find capable running backs who can produce. Has MIami? Thus far no.
They don't need to be "better" than who we have. They need to be part of a committee that makes the committee better overall. Because the committee we have now isn't good enough (just using last years stats) based on history/I can't quote everyone, so I'm just going to make a blanket statement; who are you guys purposing we sign that's better than the running backs we already have? Are you assuming that Doaks isn't going to make the roster? Or are you trying to bring in veterans that are going to be productive? I mean I don't understand what point you're trying to make here
No one on that list is better than what we have.
Qb like Rodgers dont need rb.. avg qb need good rb. To help them develop or take some of pressure of themI'm not sure that I understand this obsession with Running Backs...
1. The position has been GREATLY devalued from the old days. The rules have changed to make this a passing league, first... and last. If you are looking for a RB, he'd better be what we used to call the West-Coast style of Running Back-- a pass catcher... Alvin Kamara, Roger Craig.
2. The Bellichick coaching style believes in running back by committee. And we have a committee now... Gaskin caught 41 passes in 10 games last year. Ahmed might be as good as Gaskin. Brown is a thumper and a goal line back and he too can catch. Then we added Doaks, who looks like he might actually be a three down back...
I think that many here are trying to obtain something that might not even exist-- a 1970s style RB and a 1970s style offense.
And the Jacksonville Jaguars!I'm with you on that too. I think the only teams that can take a RB in the first are teams who are already deep everywhere else.
I don’t follow college ball but I have a son in college who does - he called me to tell me Doaks was going to be a good NFL a player for this reason.
I don't see a Derrick Henry type in at least 31 other NFL teams. They complement with great O-Line, WR and excellent play calling.a derrick henry type, who may not ever (or rarely) house it, but is so powerful he just demolishes the other team and they are unable to stop him in the 4th quarter.
i don't see anything like that on the team right now.
Good ole lets pick up a rb from the landfill thread.There's no rush to add a RB. Several will get cut from other teams and this is only May.
I don't think they're re-doing the draft so we have who we have.Good ole lets pick up a rb from the landfill thread.
Tomorrow...
GUYS MARSHALL FAULK IS 55 AND A FREE AGENT!
Derick Henry Ran like 1,300 yards against his own division almost.I don't see a Derrick Henry type in at least 31 other NFL teams. They complement with great O-Line, WR and excellent play calling.