Wallace sucks | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Wallace sucks

Nawledge

Scout Team
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
10,007
Reaction score
6,607
he sucks...does nothing to help out his qb. I'd love someone to dispute this with a real answer not blaming tannehill for missing him deep. The deep pass isn't the only play in football. Wallace sucks.
 
i see to some that RT still hasn't thrown an INT that was even almost his fault.
 
The deep pass is Wallace's bread and butter. You need a qb that can make that throw. RT has got to be the worst deep ball thrower in the NFL. At least once a game, that throw is there and RT has never made it. That seem's almost impossible to do, but RT has managed to accomplish it.
 
i see to some that RT still hasn't thrown an INT that was even almost his fault.

Tannehills not blameless but you cant say Wallace is a good wide receiver. Rishard Matthews is better. Wallace does nothing to help out his qb, he doesnt break tackles...a large gust of wind could knock him down. Hes soft.
 
Blatant PI on the throw in the end zone. He slipped on that first INT.

I'm not going to bag on Mike Wallace for today's game.
 
The deep pass is Wallace's bread and butter. You need a qb that can make that throw. RT has got to be the worst deep ball thrower in the NFL. At least once a game, that throw is there and RT has never made it. That seem's almost impossible to do, but RT has managed to accomplish it.

Wallace is NOT a playmaker. Its just the way it is. Get the ball in his hands...he goes down on first contact. Playmakers make plays, Wallace does not. He needs Tannehill to throw a perfect ball or hes worthless. The deep pass is not the only play that scores touchdowns. Wallace is not a good wide receiver...he runs fast tho.

---------- Post added at 04:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:16 PM ----------

Blatant PI on the throw in the end zone. He slipped on that first INT.

I'm not going to bag on Mike Wallace for today's game.

who said i was talking about todays game? im talking about him based on this season as a whole. Hes not a good wide receiver. He doesnt catch it with his hands. He makes no plays after the catch. You have to hit him with a perfect pass deep for him to make any type of impact in a game. Rishard Matthews is a better receiver. Hes just not as fast.
 
Tannehills not blameless but you cant say Wallace is a good wide receiver. Rishard Matthews is better. Wallace does nothing to help out his qb, he doesnt break tackles...a large gust of wind could knock him down. Hes soft.

i agree 1000% mike wallace is not worth his $30 million guaranteed but that does not excuse RT from being able to get him to do his one trick.
 
all your threads u start after every bad tannehill game is blaming anyone else but him.

tannehill had wallace wide open for an easy td that would have put us up 14-0 and prob led us to an easy win.

instead, just like he has done all year, he misses an easy throw that most backup qbs make, and changes the game.

no'' elite'' or very good qb'' leads there offense to ****ing 7 pts in 2 ****ing games in any nfl era, let alone this one where the rules are so favored towards offenses, its almost impossible not to put up lots of pts unless u get inept qb play.

yes there were dropped passes, but in every ****ing nfl game there is, and that does not mean those respective teams score ****ing 7 pts in the game.

tannehill deserves lots of blame today, and many other games, especially considering the fact how many ppl on this site have him as a top 10 qb in the nfl already, and some have him as higher than that believe it or not.
 
Has Wallace once this season dove to try to catch a pass it's like he is afraid of getting dirty
 
Wallace wasn't at fault today, not even a little.

My biggest complaint with Wallace is he doesn't go after the ball.

1) Deep ball: over thrown, but he just reaches one hand out. Most WRs dive for that ball.
2) Play in the endzone: 90% of WRs jump up for that ball. Wallace just sticks his hands up to make a basket catch. Not only does that make it harder to catch the ball, but it also is hard to sell the PI.
3) Wallace slips: No explanation needed.

1 & 2 show no effort, 3 is totally Wallace's fault. Not sure what game you watched.
 
I will say this...sherman didnt help the situation. Wallace should be moved around to try to create mismatches.

I get he is a one trick pony but for 60 million bucks he should be making an impact in more ways than deep passes. You get paid to catch the ball and make plays. The playcalling shouldve designed more plays to get Wallace into open space where he could catch and then run after the catch. It seems like Sherman has Wallace run 3 routes. Deep route, comeback and an out.

---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 PM ----------

all your threads u start after every bad tannehill game is blaming anyone else but him.

tannehill had wallace wide open for an easy td that would have put us up 14-0 and prob led us to an easy win.

instead, just like he has done all year, he misses an easy throw that most backup qbs make, and changes the game.

no'' elite'' or very good qb'' leads there offense to ****ing 7 pts in 2 ****ing games in any nfl era, let alone this one where the rules are so favored towards offenses, its almost impossible not to put up lots of pts unless u get inept qb play.

yes there were dropped passes, but in every ****ing nfl game there is, and that does not mean those respective teams score ****ing 7 pts in the game.

tannehill deserves lots of blame today, and many other games, especially considering the fact how many ppl on this site have him as a top 10 qb in the nfl already, and some have him as higher than that believe it or not.

if your gonna make claims like the one you did at least provide proof that i start threads and blame everyone else.
 
I'm not sue Wallace can lift his arms above his shoulders. He was interfered with in the endzone but he could try to battle for it, he might of gotten the call.
 
Back
Top Bottom